Opinion

SHEILA LEWIS v. THE BROWARD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD

Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Jun 17, 2020
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 11.9%

“A novation is a mutual agreement by the parties concerned for the discharge of a valid existing obligation by the substitution of a new valid obligation.”

How later courts described this case

  • “A novation is a mutual agreement by the parties concerned for the discharge of a valid existing obligation by the substitution of a new valid obligation.”
  • “Annual contracts expire at the end of the school year.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SHEILA LEWIS,

Appellant,

v.

THE BROWARD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-2768

[June 17, 2020]

Appeal from the School Board of Broward County, Florida.

Melissa C. Mihok of CPLS, P.A., Orlando, for appellant.

Douglas G. Griffin of Office of the General Counsel, Fort Lauderdale,

for appellee.

MAY, J.

We explore the statutory world of teaching contracts in this appeal from

the Broward County School Board’s decision not to renew an employee’s

teaching contract for the 2019–20 school year. The employee argues she

was entitled to an administrative hearing and automatic renewal of her

professional services contract when she was reassigned from her position

as assistant principal. We disagree and affirm.

The employee taught under a professional services contract executed

in 2007 (“PSC”). She was then promoted to assistant principal for the

2017–18 school year. When she became part of the school’s

administration, she executed an annual contract.

At the end of the 2017–18 school year, the Board did not renew her

annual contract as assistant principal. The Board “reassigned [her] to the

position of teacher for the 2018–19 school year.” She was offered another

annual contract, but never executed it. She worked as a teacher for that

year.

At the end of the 2018–19 school year, the Board notified the employee

it would not renew her annual contract. The notice advised her that she

was considered “either a probationary or annual contract teacher.” The

employee then requested an administrative hearing with the Board. She

argued her 2007 PSC should have been reinstated upon her reassignment

to teaching. And, the PSC required a showing of just cause for the non-

renewal of her contract.

The Board dismissed her request with prejudice, finding the employee

qualified as a teacher under an annual contract during the 2018–19 school

year, and she was not entitled to a hearing under due process or the

Administrative Procedures Act. The employee now appeals.

The employee argues the Board erred in dismissing her request for an

administrative hearing with prejudice because she taught under her

original PSC, and not under an annual contract. She suggests the Board

did not have the authority to terminate her PSC; therefore, she was entitled

to an administrative review.

The Board responds the employee’s PSC terminated when she signed

an annual contract to work as an assistant principal. When she was

reassigned as a teacher for the 2018–19 school year, it was under an

annual contract. Because her challenge is to an annual contract, which

terminates by its own terms, she is not entitled to an administrative

hearing.

We have de novo review of the Board’s decision. Parlato v. Secret Oaks

Owners Ass’n, 793 So. 2d 1158, 1162 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

Florida’s statutory scheme provides for three types of education

contracts: (1) a continuing contract; (2) a professional services contract;

and (3) an annual contract. Broward Teachers Union, Local 1975 v. Sch.

Bd. of Broward Cty., 199 So. 3d 997, 999 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

A PSC requires “‘a professional certificate covering the classification,

level, and area for which the applicant is deemed qualified . . . .’” Id.

(quoting § 1012.56(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2014)). PSCs “shall” be renewed each

year, unless:

(a) The district school superintendent, after receiving the

recommendations required by [section] 1012.34, charges the

employee with unsatisfactory performance and notifies the

employee of performance deficiencies as required by [section]

1012.34; or

2

(b) The employee receives two consecutive annual

performance evaluation ratings of unsatisfactory under

[section] 1012.34, two annual performance evaluation ratings

of unsatisfactory within a 3-year period under [section]

1012.34, or three consecutive annual performance evaluation

ratings of needs improvement or a combination of needs

improvement and unsatisfactory under [section] 1012.34.

§ 1012.33(3), Florida Statutes (2016).

An annual contract is an employment contract for a period of no longer

than one school year. The school board may choose to award or not award

an annual contract without cause. § 1012.335(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2016). As

of 2011, continuing contracts are no longer offered.

Prior to 2011, school boards were statutorily required to provide

teachers with PSCs. Broward Teachers Union, Local 1975, 199 So. 3d at

999 (citing § 1012.33(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2010)). In 2011, however, the

legislature removed that requirement and amended the law as follows:

Beginning July 1, 2011, each individual newly hired as

instructional personnel by the district school board shall be

awarded a probationary contract. Upon successful

completion of the probationary contract, the district school

board may award an annual contract pursuant to paragraph

(c).

§ 1012.335(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (emphasis added).

Under the new statutory scheme, “teachers hired on or after July 1,

2011, were given annual contracts which may or may not be renewed the

following school year.” Broward Teachers Union, Local 1975, 199 So. 3d

at 999. “[S]chool boards [were] no longer authorized to issue professional

service contracts. [T]he only contracts school boards are authorized to

issue . . . are probationary contracts for new hires and annual contracts

for all others.” Id. (quoting Gabriele v. Sch. Bd. of Manatee Cty., 114 So.

3d 477, 479 n.1 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)) (first alteration in original).

The legislative change did not affect individuals with a PSC predating

July 1, 2011. Those individuals were still statutorily entitled to renewal of

their PSC unless their performance was unsatisfactory. § 1012.33(3)(a),

(b), Fla. Stat.; Gabriele, 114 So. 3d at 481.

The employee acknowledges the Board can no longer offer a PSC to a

3

new hire, but argues her 2007 PSC did not terminate when she entered

the annual contract to become assistant principal. Her argument is flawed

because she fails to consider section 1012.22(1)(c)(4)(a), Florida Statutes.

It provides:

The district school board shall adopt a salary schedule or

salary schedules to be used as the basis for paying all school

employees hired before July 1, 2014 . . . . Instructional

personnel on continuing contract or professional service

contract may opt into the performance salary schedule if the

employee relinquishes such contract and agrees to be

employed on an annual contract under s[ection] 1012.335.

Such an employee . . . may not return to continuing contract

or professional service contract status.

Id. (emphasis added).

“[A] teacher employed under an annual contract has no right to

reemployment.” Gabriele, 114 So. 3d at 479; accord Broward Teachers

Union, Local 1975, 199 So. 3d at 1002. When the employee entered into

her annual contract to become assistant principal, she relinquished her

right to the prior PSC. See Bornstein v. Marcus, 275 So. 3d 636, 639 (Fla.

4th DCA 2019) (“A novation is a mutual agreement by the parties

concerned for the discharge of a valid existing obligation by the

substitution of a new valid obligation.”) (quoting Miami Nat’l Bank v.

Forecast Constr. Corp., 366 So. 2d 1202, 1204 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)). Unlike

a PSC, an annual contract does not guarantee tenure. See Gabriele, 114

So. 3d at 479 (“Annual contracts expire at the end of the school year.”).

PSCs entered into before July 1, 2011 are entitled to renewal unless

the employee’s performance is dissatisfactory or the employee enters into

an annual contract. See Forsythe v. Longboat Key Beach Erosion Control

Dist., 604 So. 2d 452, 455 (Fla. 1992). Section 1012.22(1)(c)(4)(a) expressly

prohibits the return to a prior PSC.

Here, the employee worked under a PSC until she executed an annual

contract to become assistant principal for the 2017–18 school year. When

she did so, her PSC terminated by its own annual term. When the Board

reassigned her to teaching the next year, section 1012.22(1)(c)(4)(a)

prohibited her from returning to her PSC.

The employee could have taught the 2018–19 school year only under

an annual or probationary contract. Neither contract entitled her to an

administrative hearing. See Jones v. Miami-Dade Cty., Public Sch., 816 So.

4

2d 824, 826 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (holding where there was “no entitlement

to continued employment beyond the completion of the individual contract

year . . . there was no entitlement to a hearing under the due process cases

. . . or the under the Florida Administrative Procedure Act.”). We therefore

affirm.

Affirmed.

WARNER and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

5

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.