Opinion

United States v. Frederick Brown, Jr.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Apr 2, 2020
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7448

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

FREDERICK GASTON BROWN, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at

Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:90-cr-00149-RGD-3)

Submitted: March 31, 2020 Decided: April 2, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frederick Gaston Brown, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Frederick Gaston Brown, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(1)(B) (2018) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brown,

No. 2:90-cr-00149-RGD-3 (E.D. Va. Sept. 19, 2019). We deny Brown’s motion to appoint

counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.