Opinion

Akeda Pearson v. Board of Education

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Mar 23, 2020
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-2121

DR. AKEDA PEARSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY; MAMIE

PERKINS, Interim Superintendent, in her official capacity,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

ARLEN LIVERMAN, Deputy Superintendent; GEORGE ARLOTTO, Chief of

Staff,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.

Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:17-cv-02358-CCB)

Submitted: March 12, 2020 Decided: March 23, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DIAZ, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Akeda Pearson, Appellant Pro Se. Kemp Walden Hammond, ANNE ARUNDEL

COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM:

Akeda Pearson appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to

Defendants in Pearson’s employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Pearson v. Board of Educ. Of Anne Arundel Cnty., No. 1:17-cv-02358-CCB (D.

Md. Sept. 10, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.