Opinion

Jackson v. United States Government

Court
District Court, District of Columbia
Filed
Mar 9, 2020
Status
Published
On the bench
Judge Trevor N. McFadden
Nature of suit
Civil
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 11.2%

The opinion

FILED

MAR -9 2020

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy

Courts for the District of Columbia

JOANNE E. JACKSON,

Plaintiff,

Vv. ) Civil Action No. 20-0581 (UNA)

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, ef al.,

Defendants.

)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on review of this pro se plaintiff's application to proceed

in forma pauperis and her civil complaint.

The Court has reviewed the plaintiff's complaint, keeping in mind that complaints filed

by pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings

drafted by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants must

comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239

(D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint

contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the Court’s jurisdiction depends, a

short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand

for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum

standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to

prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the

doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown vy. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

It appears that the plaintiff involuntarily has been hospitalized for mental health treatment

where she was forced to take medications which caused severe side effects. It does not appear

that the plaintiff is in custody or is hospitalized at this time, and she asked to be “released from

outpatient commitment.” Compl. at 2. The few allegations of her complaint do not state a basis

for this Court’s subject matter jurisdiction or indicate whether or how the named defendants have

caused the plaintiff harm. As drafted, this complaint fails to meet Rule 8(a)’s minimal pleading

standard.

The Court will grant the plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and will

dismiss the complaint and this civil action without prejudice. An Order consistent with this

Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

DATE: March { QO 2020

TREVOR N. McFADDEN

United States District Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.