Opinion

Burgio v. Commissioner

  • 4 B.T.A. 4
  • 1926 BTA LEXIS 2393
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Apr 21, 1926
Status
Published
On the bench
Marquette, Green, Love, Mokris
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

FINDINGS OE FACT.

The taxpayer is a resident of the City of New York. He was, during the year 1923, in the employ of A. Y. Victorius & Co., a corporation with its principal place of business at 370 Broadway, New York City. During a portion of such year he traveled as a salesman for this company, and, while so traveling, his expenses were advanced to him by his employer and by the employer charged to his account. The taxpayer was not in any way reimbursed for the amounts so expended. The advances made by the employer to the taxpayer monthly were as follows:

[[Image here]]

June_ 253

September-¡_ 219

Sept. 27 to Oet. 5- 66

Total_ 785

The taxpayer paid during the year necessary traveling expenses in the sum of $785.

Order of no deficiency will be entered accordingly.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.