Opinion

Kins v. Commissioner

  • 3 B.T.A. 1348
  • 1926 BTA LEXIS 2416
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Apr 20, 1926
Status
Published
On the bench
Phillips, Trammell
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 66.0%

The opinion

FINDINGS OF FACT.

The taxpayer is an individual residing at Newark, N. J. During the years involved he was engaged in the cloak and suit business at Newark. Fie had in his employ during 1919, Hannah Strum, Lena Goldbaum, and Charles Strum.

During 1919 the taxpayer paid salaries to the above-named employees as follows:

Hannah Strum-$2, 080

Lena Goldbaum_ 2,080

Charles Strum_ I, 560

During 1920 the taxpayer had in his employ the same employees and one Irwin Kins. During that year he paid salaries to. such employees as follows:

Hannah Strum_$1,271. 07

Lena Goldbaum_ 2, 600. 00

Charles Strum_ 1,750.00

Irwin Kins- 1,200.00

*1349 During tbe years 1919 and 1920 the above amounts of salaries were paid said employees for services actually rendered, which compensation was reasonable.

The Commissioner disallowed the deductions for salaries claimed to have been paid by the taxpayer to the extent of $4,569 in 1919 and $4,035 in 1920, because the employees were relatives of the taxpayer and no entries were made upon the taxpayer’s books of account showing such payment.

Order of redetermination will be entered on 10 days’ notice, under Rule 50.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.