Opinion

Hartley v. Commissioner

  • 27 B.T.A. 952
  • 1933 BTA LEXIS 1278
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Mar 16, 1933
Status
Published
Author
Murdock
On the bench
Aeundell, McMahon, Lansdon, Goodrioh, Morris, Fossan, Murdock
Cited by
1 cases

The opinion

Murdock,

dissenting: The period within which a claim for refund or credit may be effectively filed begins with the time the tax was paid. The findings of fact do not disclose when any tax was paid. Consequently, I can not determine whether the election was timely filed on July 27,1928. But assuming that it was timely filed, section 702 (a) of the Revenue Act of 1928 deals only with the computation of gain or loss and has nothing whatever to do with the basis for depletion and depreciation. Some of the properties upon which depletion and depreciation are being claimed in this case were not sold and section 702 (a) can have no bearing upon the issue raised in connection with those properties.

The Board is not justified in reversing the Commissioner’s dis-allowance of the salary deduction for 1924 on the facts found.

GoodRioh agrees with this dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.