Opinion

Pennsylvania Co. for Ins., etc. v. Commissioner

  • 25 B.T.A. 1168
  • 1932 BTA LEXIS 1415
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Apr 18, 1932
Status
Published
Author
Smith
On the bench
Lansdon, Sternhagen, Muedoce, Smith
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Smith,

dissenting: In my opinion the deduction of the bequest to the Anti-Vivisection Society of America is authorized by the statute. Section 303 (a) (3) of the Eevenue Act of 1924 provides for the deduction from the gross estate of “the amount of all bequests * * * to or for the use of any corporation organized and operated exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, literary, or educational purposes, including the encouragement of art and the prevention of cruelty to children or animals * * The statute is concerned only with the “ purpose ” for which the corporation was organized and operated. The discussion in the majority opinion as to whether the practice of vivisection is in a legal sense a cruelty to animals or beneficent to mankind goes beyond the necessities of the case. The evidence pertaining to the organization and operation of the American Anti-Vivisection Society seems to me to indicate clearly that its purposes and practices were directed generally towards prevention of cruelty to animals. I think that the bequest is deductible.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.