Opinion

Utah Home Fire Ins. Co. v. Commissioner

  • 24 B.T.A. 225
  • 1931 BTA LEXIS 1679
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Sep 29, 1931
Status
Published
Author
Murdock
On the bench
Goodrich, Murdock
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Murdock,

concurring: I believe that the correct result has been reached in this case. The only question in the case is, IIow much, by way of premiums, did the company earn during the year ? This being so, it seems to me unnecessary to discuss the question of where the actual dollars came from which went into the reserve or which were released from the reserve. If in prior years, surplus had to be reduced in order to set up the reserve, that fact has no effect upon income for the current year.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.