Opinion

S. C. Toof & Co. v. Commissioner

  • 21 B.T.A. 916
  • 1930 BTA LEXIS 1763
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Dec 29, 1930
Status
Published
Author
Muhdock
On the bench
Muhdock, Consideration, Steenhagen, Love
Cited by
1 cases

The opinion

Muhdock,

dissenting: I dissent from that part of the opinion which under the third and fourth issues approves the inventory method used by the petitioner. This method was inadequate and inaccurate, and so far as we know there was no justification or excuse for its use. It is not in accordance with the best accounting principles and it is not authorized by the Commissioner’s regulations or the revenue acts. Consequently, the petitioner should have no relief from such adjustments as were here made until it changes its method of taking inventory. Otherwise, I concur in the result reached in the prevailing opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.