Opinion

Croker v. Commissioner

  • 21 B.T.A. 240
  • 1930 BTA LEXIS 1890
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Nov 7, 1930
Status
Published
Author
Seawell
On the bench
Smith, Lansdon, Trussell, Seawell, Steenhagen, Agree
Cited by
1 cases

The opinion

Seawell,

dissenting: I do not agree with the legal conclusion reached in this case. When it is found as facts that the taxpayer and her husband were engaged in the real estate business, and that this business was “ tied ” up for two years, by suit brought by the stepson as next friend to his father and that the $6,500 attorney fee was paid to defend the suit and by the defense the business was untied, then neither the Joyce case nor the Field case cited is, in my opinion, authority for the decision.

It is my opinion that the attorney fee paid under the circumstances detailed is a deductible ordinary and necessary business expense under section 214 (a) (1) of the Revenue Act of 1921.

LaNsdoN, Smith, Trussell, and VaN Fossan agree with this dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.