Opinion

Auerbach v. Commissioner

  • 2 B.T.A. 67
  • 1925 BTA LEXIS 2561
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Jun 15, 1925
Status
Published
Author
Love
On the bench
Lansdon, Gkeen, Love
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 51.5%

The opinion

*69 OPINION.

Love:

The expense of putting new roof on building and repair

of boilers was of a permanent nature, and hence constituted a capital expenditure and should be allowed as such.

The items of repairing gutters on building, repairing concrete around building, and decorating and painting, being temporary and of frequent recurrence, were, as well as the items of janitor service, water, • coal, interest, and premium on fire insurance, current necessary expense.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.