Opinion

Nevin v. Commissioner

  • 16 B.T.A. 15
  • 1929 BTA LEXIS 2664
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Apr 15, 1929
Status
Published
Author
Sternhagen
On the bench
Geeen, Trammell, Agree, Lansdon, Sternhagen, Marquette, Arundell
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

SterNhageN,

dissenting: I am of opinion that the Board has erroneously applied the law. The statute requires the petitioner to prove “ to the contrary ” of the presumption that the transfer was made in contemplation of death. C. D. Lehman, Executor, 6 B. T. A. 791. I do not think the Board has tested the evidence by the statutory method. If it had done so, I think it would be decided that the preponderance of the evidence did not overcome the statutory presumption.

LaNSdoN, Marquette, Trammell, AruNdell, and Murdock agree with this dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.