Opinion

Leydig v. Commissioner

  • 15 B.T.A. 124
  • 1929 BTA LEXIS 2919
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Jan 29, 1929
Status
Published
Author
Murdock
On the bench
Sternhagen, Siefkin, Murdock
Cited by
8 cases

The opinion

Murdock, dissenting:

I dissent from a part of the foregoing opinion for the reason that in my judgment the husband in this case can only be said at most to have assigned the future income from his leases. This does not relieve him from tax upon such income when derived from the leases.

Sternhagen agrees with this dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.