Opinion

Zabolotny v. Commissioner

  • 97 T.C. 385
  • 97 T.C. No. 27
  • 1991 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 87
Court
United States Tax Court
Filed
Sep 30, 1991
Status
Published
Author
Parr
On the bench
DRENNEN,NIMS,CHABOT,SHIELDS,HAMBLEN,COHEN,JACOBS,GERBER,WRIGHT,WELLS,WHALEN,HALPERN,PARR,RUWE,BEGHE,KORNER,SWIFT,PARR,COLVIN,PARR,RUWE
Cited by
17 cases

"[R]easonable cause within the meaning of section 6651(a)(1) can be shown by proof that the taxpayer supplied all relevant information to a competent tax adviser and relied in good faith on the incorrect advice of the adviser that no return was required to be filed."

How later courts described this case

  • "[R]easonable cause within the meaning of section 6651(a)(1) can be shown by proof that the taxpayer supplied all relevant information to a competent tax adviser and relied in good faith on the incorrect advice of the adviser that no return was required to be filed."
  • reasonable reliance on a tax adviser that no return is required to be filed may constitute reasonable cause
  • the taxpayer was a disqualified person under section 4975(e)(2)(H) because he was an officer of the corporation whose employees participated in the plan

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

PARR, J., dissenting: I have joined in the dissents of both Judges Ruwe and Beghe. I agree with Judge Beghe that we should inquire into the qualified status of the trust. However, if the trust should be held qualified, I would agree with Judge Ruwe’s opinion on the measure of the excise tax liability.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.