Opinion

Steadman v. Comm'r

  • 50 T.C. 369
  • 1968 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 121
Court
United States Tax Court
Filed
May 22, 1968
Status
Published
Author
Fat
On the bench
Dawson,Fay,Simpson,Tannenwald,Drennen,Tietjens,Raum,Hoyt
Cited by
57 cases

holding that corporate stock was worthless even though the corporation held valuable assets because the taxpayer proved that corporate stock had no liquidating or potential future value

How later courts described this case

  • holding that corporate stock was worthless even though the corporation held valuable assets because the taxpayer proved that corporate stock had no liquidating or potential future value
  • noting that uncontroverted expert testimony that stock was worthless in a given year supported taxpayer’s worthless stock deduction
  • including appointment of a receiver, cessation of normal business operations, bankruptcy, and liquidation as examples of identifiable events
  • bankruptcy filing is an identifiable event indicative of worthlessness

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Fat, /., concurring: I agree with Judge Simpson’s concurring opinion, but in choosing a year I would agree with the majority that the loss was properly allowable in 1962.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.