Opinion
The opinion
MuRdock, J., dissenting: The petitioner is not entitled to any deduction for interest. The machinery manufacturers computed imaginary interest in arriving at the amounts they would demand of the petitioner for the use of the machines, but the petitioner owed no debt, did not agree to pay interest and paid no interest.
Leech and Disney, JJ., agree with this dissent.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.
A word about cookies
We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.