Opinion

United States v. Kareem Brown

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Dec 20, 2019
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7159

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KAREEM BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at

Newport News. Mark S. Davis, Chief District Judge. (4:17-cr-00113-MSD-RJK-1)

Submitted: December 17, 2019 Decided: December 20, 2019

Before KING, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kareem Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kareem Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for an extension

of time to appeal his criminal judgment. Upon review, we conclude that the district court

correctly determined that it was unable to extend the time for filing a timely notice of appeal

of the criminal judgment because Brown filed his motion after the expiration of the

excusable neglect period. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4). Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brown, No. 4:17-cr-00113-MSD-RJK-

1 (E.D. Va. July 18, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.