Opinion

Rice v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Court
United States Court of Federal Claims
Filed
Nov 15, 2019
Status
Unpublished
On the bench
Mindy Michaels Roth
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 14-321V

Filed: October 21, 2019

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

ASHLEY RICE and CRAIG RICE * UNPUBLISHED

parents of R.R, a minor, *

*

Petitioners, * Decision on Joint Stipulation;

* Acute Hemorrhagic

v. * Leukoencephalitis (“AHLE”);

* Acute Disseminated

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Encephalomyelitis (“ADEM”);

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Measles-mumps-rubella

* (“MMR”) Vaccine; Hepatitis A

Respondent. * Vaccine; Influenza Vaccine

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

Edward Kraus, Esq., Law Offices of Chicago Kent, Chicago, IL, for petitioner.

Traci Patton, Esq., US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1

Roth, Special Master:

On April 21, 2014, Ashley and Craig Rice [“Mr. and Mrs. Rice” or “petitioners”] filed a

petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program 2 on behalf of

their minor child, R.R. Petitioners allege that R.R. suffered from acute hemorrhagic

leukoencephalitis (“AHLE”), a severe form of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (“ADEM”)

after receiving measles-mumps-rubella (“MMR”), hepatitis A, and influenza vaccinations on

March 26, 2012. Stipulation, filed Oct. 18, 2019, at ¶¶ 1-4. Respondent denies that any of the

aforementioned immunizations caused R.R.’s injury or her current condition. Stipulation at ¶ 6.

1

Although this Decision has been formally designated “unpublished,” it will nevertheless be posted on the

Court of Federal Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-

347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). This means the Decision

will be available to anyone with access to the internet. However, the parties may object to the Decision’s

inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party

has fourteen days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is

a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes

medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of

privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole Decision will be available to the public. Id.

2

National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

(2012).

Nevertheless, the parties have agreed to settle the case. On October 18, 2019, the parties

filed a joint stipulation agreeing to settle this case and describing the settlement terms.

Respondent agrees to issue the following payments:

(1) A lump sum of $741,454.94, representing compensation for first year life care

expenses ($141,454.94) and trust seed funds ($600,000.00), in the form of a check

payable to Regions Bank, as trustee of the grantor reversionary trust established for the

benefit of R.R.;

(2) A lump sum of $586,000.00, representing compensation for lost earnings and pain

and suffering, in the form of a check payable to petitioners as

guardian(s)/conservator(s) of the estate of R.R., for the benefit of R.R. No payments

shall be made until petitioners provide respondent with documentation establishing that

they have been appointed as guardian(s)/conservator(s) of R.R.’s estate;

(3) A lump sum of $14,000.00, representing compensation for past unreimbursable

expenses, in the form of a check payable to petitioners, Ashley and Craig Rice;

(4) A lump sum of $172,366.03, representing reimbursement of a lien for services

rendered on behalf of R.R., in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioners and

DHHS

Reporting and Receivables

P.O. Box 8355

Columbia, SC 29202-9189

Case Number: 327172

Attn: Latwainia Benjamin

(5) An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in paragraph 10

of the stipulation attached hereto, paid to the life insurance company from which the

annuity will be purchased. This amount represents compensation for all damages that

would be available under § 300aa-15(a).

I adopt the parties’ stipulation attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount and

on the terms set forth therein. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance

with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Mindy Michaels Roth

Mindy Michaels Roth

Special Master

3

Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice

renouncing the right to seek review.

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.