Opinion

Stephen Chamberlain v. Samuel Brown

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Nov 6, 2019
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1246

STEPHEN D. CHAMBERLAIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SAMUEL J. BROWN; MARIETTA B. WARREN; JUDITH C. CHAMBERLAIN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.

George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:17-cv-02880-GLR)

Submitted: September 30, 2019 Decided: November 6, 2019

Before WILKINSON, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen D. Chamberlain, Appellant Pro Se. Alvin I. Frederick, ECCLESTON & WOLF,

PC, Hanover, Maryland; Patrick Dugan McKevitt, WHITEFORD, TAYLOR &

PRESTON, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Stephen D. Chamberlain appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his amended

complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error in the district court’s rejection of Chamberlain’s abuse of process claims,

the only claims he raised on appeal. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Chamberlain v. Brown, No. 1:17-cv-02880-GLR (D. Md. Aug. 1, 2018; filed

Feb. 28, 2019 & entered Mar. 1, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.