Opinion

Kevin Lamar Brown v. State of Florida

Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Sep 20, 2019
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 9.0%

The opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-494

_____________________________

KEVIN LAMAR BROWN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

W. Joel Boles, Judge.

September 20, 2019

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus raises claims

that, if properly treated as a motion for postconviction relief, are

untimely and successive, and is therefore frivolous and an abuse

of the postconviction process. We affirm the lower court’s denial of

the motion, and we direct the Clerk to forward a certified copy of

this opinion to the Department of Corrections for potential

disciplinary action against Appellant. See Ponton v. Willis, 172 So.

3d 574, 576-77 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or

9.331.

_____________________________

Kevin Lamar Brown, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Michael McDermott, Assistant

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.