Opinion

Shirley Brown v. Bank of America, N.A.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
Aug 26, 2019
Status
Unpublished
Nature of suit
Civil
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 8.8%

although pro se pleadings are construed liberally, a plaintiff must present factual allegations sufficient to state a plausible claim for relief

How later courts described this case

  • although pro se pleadings are construed liberally, a plaintiff must present factual allegations sufficient to state a plausible claim for relief

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 26 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHIRLEY BROWN, No. 18-56625

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-03418-DDP-AGR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Dean D. Pregerson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 19, 2019**

Before: SCHROEDER, PAEZ, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Shirley Brown appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

her action alleging federal and state law claims arising from the foreclosure sale of

her property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a

dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Kwan v. SanMedica

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

**

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Int’l, 854 F.3d 1088, 1093 (9th Cir. 2017). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Brown’s wrongful foreclosure and

fraud claims under California law because Brown failed to allege facts sufficient to

state a plausible claim. See Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 341-42 (9th Cir. 2010)

(although pro se pleadings are construed liberally, a plaintiff must present factual

allegations sufficient to state a plausible claim for relief); Robinson Helicopter Co.

v. Dana Corp., 102 P.3d 268, 274 (Cal. 2004) (elements of fraud claim); Sciarratta

v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Assn, 202 Cal. Rptr. 3d 219, 226 (Ct. App. 2016) (elements of

wrongful foreclosure claim). Brown’s contention that the bankruptcy of

LandAmerica Financial Group, the parent company of the original trustee under

the deed of trust, rendered these foreclosure proceedings wrongful is unpersuasive.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

2 18-56625

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.