Opinion

Massi v. City of Chester Aggregated Pension Board

  • 206 A.3d 1026
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Apr 16, 2019
Status
Published
On the bench
Per Curiam
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

M.D. Appeal Dkt.

38 MAP 2019

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

JOSEPH M. MASSI, SR., : No. 528 MAL 2018

:

Petitioner :

: Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

: the Order of the Commonwealth Court

v. :

:

:

CITY OF CHESTER AGGREGATED :

PENSION BOARD AND CITY OF :

CHESTER, :

:

Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of April, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner are:

(1) May a municipal employer infringe upon the vested right of a city employee

by imposing restrictions not specifically contained in its disability ordinance

or its agreed-upon collective bargaining agreement?

(2) May a police officer rely upon the terms of a collective bargaining agreement

which sets forth no deadlines for claiming a disability pension in making

such application after his technical date of retirement?

(3) Absent language to the contrary, does a police officer vest in entitlement to

a disability pension on the date of his injury, and, absent language to the

contrary, should the time of confirmation of the disability, and not the date

of application, be determinative of a disability pension eligibility?

(4) Does a police officer who has retired forfeit the ability to seek the protection

of his collective bargaining agreement, and cease to be considered as a

police officer once his retirement has taken effect?

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.