reviewing district court’s decision whether to reduce sentence under § 3582(c)(2) for abuse of discretion
How later courts described this case
- reviewing district court’s decision whether to reduce sentence under § 3582(c)(2) for abuse of discretion
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6993
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ELMER KERMIT BROWN, a/k/a Elmo,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Elizabeth City. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (2:11-cr-00035-D-1)
Submitted: December 20, 2018 Decided: December 27, 2018
Before DIAZ and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elmer Kermit Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Elmer Kermit Brown appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Muldrow, 844 F.3d 434, 437
(4th Cir. 2016) (reviewing district court’s decision whether to reduce sentence under
§ 3582(c)(2) for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2