Opinion

JOSHUA DANIEL BROWN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

  • 256 So. 3d 901
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Oct 24, 2018
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 5.6%

remanding for trial court to correct statute number on appellant’s sentence

How later courts described this case

  • remanding for trial court to correct statute number on appellant’s sentence

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOSHUA DANIEL BROWN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

Nos. 4D17-2510 and 4D17-2512

[October 24, 2018]

Consolidated appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial

Circuit, Palm Beach County; Cheryl Caracuzzo, Judge; L.T. Case Nos.

502016CF011075A and 502016CF012596A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Gary Lee Caldwell, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anesha Worthy,

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

KLINGENSMITH, J.

Appellant Joshua Brown appeals his convictions and sentences for the

fraudulent use of personal identification information and grand theft, as

well as the amended order revoking his probation. We affirm those

convictions and sentences without comment, but write to address the trial

court’s amended order revoking probation.

Brown first challenged the revocation order under Florida Rule of

Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2) because the order included a violation that

had not been proven by any evidence and incorrectly listed December 24,

2016, as the violation date, when the violation of probation affidavit and

testimony established that the violations occurred on December 23, 2016.

The trial court granted the motion; however, the amended order failed to

correct the violation date.

A review of the record shows the trial court intended to correct the

scrivener’s errors but failed to do so, and such written errors remained in

the amended order. Accordingly, we affirm Brown’s convictions and

sentences, but remand with instructions for the trial court to correct the

violation dates. See Obas v. State, 238 So. 3d 853, 854 (Fla. 4th DCA

2018); Ali v. State, 215 So. 3d 1250, 1251 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017); see also

Sweeney v. State, 138 So. 3d 1095, 1095 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (remanding

for trial court to correct statute number on appellant’s sentence). Brown’s

presence is not required for this ministerial action. See Obas, 238 So. 3d

at 854.

Affirmed, but remanded for correction of scrivener’s errors.

TAYLOR AND KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.