Opinion

Issac Lee Wells v. State

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
Aug 31, 2018
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 5.2%

The opinion

Opinion issued August 31, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-18-00558-CR

———————————

ISSAC LEE WELLS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 119th District Court

Tom Green County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. B-17-0698-SB

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal from a conviction for two counts of harassment

of a public servant. The trial court imposed appellant’s sentence on February 27,

2018. The trial court certified that this was not a plea-bargain case and that appellant

had the right to appeal. Appellant timely filed a motion for new trial on March 16,

2018, but he did not file a notice of appeal until June 14, 2018. This was too late.

In criminal cases in which a party timely files a motion for new trial, the

appellant must file a notice of appeal “within 90 days after the day sentence is

imposed.” TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(2). Thus, the deadline for filing the notice of

appeal here was May 29, 2018. Appellant filed his notice of appeal on June 14, 2018.

Thus, his notice of appeal was not timely filed. Without a timely-filed notice of

appeal, we lack jurisdiction. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1996).

Rule 26.3 permits an appellate court to extend the time to file the notice of

appeal if appellant files a motion for extension of time within 15 days of the deadline

for filing the notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Although appellant stated

that he intended to file a motion for extension of time, this record contains no such

motion, and no motion for extension may be implied in criminal cases. See Lair v.

State, 321 S.W.3d 158, 159 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2010, pet. ref’d) (citing

Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 523).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dismiss any

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Caughey.

2

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

3

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.