“Thus, if a proper supersedeas bond is not filed, the judgment may be enforced, including issuance of a writ of possession evicting the tenant from the premises.”
How later courts described this case
- “Thus, if a proper supersedeas bond is not filed, the judgment may be enforced, including issuance of a writ of possession evicting the tenant from the premises.”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER
Appellate case name: Darrius Banks v. Ramin Equities, LLC
Appellate case number: 01-18-00401-CV
Trial court case number: 1107428
Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County
Appellant, acting pro se, has filed a motion requesting that this Court set aside a writ of
possession executing on a final judgment in an eviction suit. The motion is denied. See TEX. PROP.
CODE § 24.007 (“A judgment of a county court [in an eviction suit] may not under any
circumstances be stayed pending appeal unless, within 10 days of the signing of the judgment, the
appellant files a supersedeas bond in an amount set by the county court.”); Marshall v. Housing
Authority of City of San Antonio, 198 S.W.3d 782, 785 (Tex. 2006) (“Thus, if a proper supersedeas
bond is not filed, the judgment may be enforced, including issuance of a writ of possession evicting
the tenant from the premises.”)
It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown
Acting individually
Date: May 23, 2018