Opinion

Rosenthal v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Court
United States Court of Federal Claims
Filed
May 11, 2018
Status
Unpublished
On the bench
Nora Beth Dorsey
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 17-0693V

Filed: February 16, 2018

UNPUBLISHED

TODD ROSENTHAL,

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Petitioner, Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

v. Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

SECRETARY OF HEALTH Administration (SIRVA)

AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Alison H. Haskins, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Washington, DC, for petitioner.

Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for

respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On May 24, 2017, Todd Rosenthal (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation

under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et

seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a left shoulder injury as a

result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine he received on September 29, 2015. Petition at 1.

The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On February 16, 2018, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he

concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule

4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent states that “petitioner’s alleged injury is

consistent with a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (‘SIRVA’), as defined

on the Vaccine Injury Table. Specifically, petitioner had no history of pain, inflammation,

1

Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2

National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §

300aa (2012).

or dysfunction of his left shoulder; medical records document that pain occurred within

48 hours after receipt of an intramuscular vaccination; pain was limited to the shoulder

in which the vaccine was administered; and no other condition or abnormality has been

identified to explain petitioner’s shoulder pain.” Id. at 4. Respondent further agrees that

petitioner suffered the residual effects of his condition for more than six months. Id.

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

Chief Special Master

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.