Opinion

Chally v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Court
United States Court of Federal Claims
Filed
Apr 9, 2018
Status
Unpublished
On the bench
Nora Beth Dorsey
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 17-0448V

Filed: January 24, 2018

UNPUBLISHED

BETTY CHALLY,

Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint

Petitioner, Stipulation on Damages; Influenza

v. (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury

Related to Vaccine Administration

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND (SIRVA)

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Alison H. Haskins, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Sarasota, FL, for petitioner.

Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for

respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On March 28, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a left shoulder injury as a result of

receiving an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on November 13, 2015. Petition at ¶ 2; Stipulation,

filed January 24, 2018, at ¶ 4. Petitioner further alleges that the vaccine was

administered in the United States, she suffered the effects of the injury for more than six

months, and there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages

as a result of her condition. Petition at ¶¶ 1, 2-16, 19-20; Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5.

Respondent “denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner’s alleged SIRVA or any other

injury and further denies that her current disabilities are a sequela of a vaccine-related

injury ” Stipulation at ¶ 6.

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §

300aa (2012).

Nevertheless, on January 24, 2018, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation,

stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. The undersigned

finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding

damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, the undersigned

awards the following compensation:

A lump sum of $122,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.

Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of

damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Id.

The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of

the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice

renouncing the right to seek review.

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.