Opinion

Joseph Brown v. Charles Ratledge

  • 709 F. App'x 215
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Jan 23, 2018
Status
Unpublished
On the bench
Gregory, Shedd, Harris
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 4.2%

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7387

JOSEPH A. BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CHARLES RATLEDGE, Warden,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at

Roanoke. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, District Judge. (7:16-cv-00303-EKD-RSB)

Submitted: January 18, 2018 Decided: January 23, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph A. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph W.H. Mott, OFFICE OF THE UNITED

STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph A. Brown appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint

filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403

U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Ratledge,

No. 7:16-cv-00303-EKD-RSB (W.D. Va. Sept. 29, 2017). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.