Opinion

Waneley Brown v. United States

  • 705 F. App'x 196
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Dec 6, 2017
Status
Unpublished
On the bench
Wilkinson, Agee, Hamilton
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6821

WANELEY WRAY BROWN, a/k/a Waynely Brown,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at

Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:17-cr-00017-MR)

Submitted: November 16, 2017 Decided: December 6, 2017

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Waneley Wray Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Waneley Wray Brown appeals the district court’s order and judgment denying his

petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. United

States, No. 1:17-cv-00017-MR (W.D.N.C. June 19, 2017). We grant Brown leave to

proceed in forma pauperis and his motion to supplement his informal brief. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.