Opinion

Donna Klecka v. Daniel Cox

  • 696 F. App'x 311
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
Aug 22, 2017
Status
Unpublished
On the bench
Graber, Clifton, Smith
Nature of suit
Civil
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 44.6%

holding that when Plaintiff cites no relevant case law, qualified immunity will be granted

How later courts described this case

  • holding that when Plaintiff cites no relevant case law, qualified immunity will be granted

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AUG 22 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

DONNA KLECKA, No. 16-35261

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:14-cv-00129-JWS

v.

MEMORANDUM*

DANIEL COX,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Alaska

John W. Sedwick, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2017**

Anchorage, Alaska

Before: GRABER, CLIFTON, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Donna Klecka appeals the district court’s grant of summary

judgment, based on qualified immunity, to Defendant Daniel Cox. Like the district

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

**

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

court, we conclude that Defendant is entitled to qualified immunity, and therefore

summary judgment was appropriate. Accordingly, we affirm.

Plaintiff did not satisfy her burden of proving that Defendant’s conduct

violated a clearly established constitutional right. Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S.

223, 231 (2009). First, Plaintiff failed to prove that Defendant acted in an

objectively unreasonable manner given the circumstances. Sandoval v. Las Vegas

Metro. Police Dep’t, 756 F.3d 1154, 1166 (9th Cir. 2014). Plaintiff was actively

resisting arrest, at one point evading another officer’s grip with a loose handcuff

attached to her wrist. It was not unreasonable for Defendant to perceive this action

as a potential threat and respond accordingly. Further, Defendant was not on notice

that he was responding with an unreasonable amount of force. Brooks v. Clark

County, 828 F.3d 910, 920 (9th Cir. 2016). Not only have we found similar uses of

force to be appropriate in comparable situations, see Tatum v. City of San

Francisco, 441 F.3d 1090, 1096 (9th Cir. 2006), but Plaintiff cites no case law to

demonstrate that it was clearly established that such conduct violated her

constitutional rights.

AFFIRMED.

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.