Opinion

Shameka Yvette McClain v. State

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
May 18, 2017
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 3.7%

noting that agreement to plead guilty in exchange for State’s reduction of charge is plea bargain under Rule 25.2(a)(2)

How later courts described this case

  • noting that agreement to plead guilty in exchange for State’s reduction of charge is plea bargain under Rule 25.2(a)(2)

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Opinion issued May 18, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-17-00194-CR

———————————

SHAMEKA YVETTE MCCLAIN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 182nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1497354

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Shameka Yvette McClain, pleaded guilty to the reduced class A

misdemeanor offense of deadly conduct, with an agreed punishment

recommendation of ten days in county jail and a $700 fine.1 In exchange for

1

See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.05(a), (e) (West 1994).

appellant’s plea, the State had agreed to reduce the charge from the second-degree

felony offense of aggravated assault to class A misdemeanor deadly conduct.2 In

accordance with her plea bargain with the State, the trial court found appellant guilty

and assessed her punishment at ten days’ confinement in county jail and a $700 fine.3

The trial court certified that this was a plea-bargain case and that appellant had no

right of appeal, but appellant, through counsel, timely appealed. See TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(a)(2), 26.2(a). We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

In a plea-bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were

raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’s

permission to appeal. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02 (West 1977); TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the

defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. TEX. R. APP.

P. 25.2(d).

Here, the trial court’s certification is included in the clerk’s record and states

that this is a plea-bargain case and that appellant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d); Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

The record confirms that appellant pleaded guilty to the reduced class A

misdemeanor deadly conduct charge and, thus, supports the trial court’s

2

See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.02(a)(2), (b) (West 2009).

3

See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 12.21(3) (West 1994).

2

certification. See Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 615; Shankle v. State, 119 S.W.3d 808, 813

(Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (noting that agreement to plead guilty in exchange for

State’s reduction of charge is plea bargain under Rule 25.2(a)(2)). Because appellant

has no right of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal. See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d

675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Bland, and Brown.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

3

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.