Opinion

Steven Andrue Acuna v. State

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
May 16, 2017
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 3.7%

noting that agreement to plead guilty in exchange for State’s reduction of charge is plea bargain under Rule 25.2(a)(2)

How later courts described this case

  • noting that agreement to plead guilty in exchange for State’s reduction of charge is plea bargain under Rule 25.2(a)(2)

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Opinion issued May 16, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-17-00220-CR

———————————

STEVEN ANDRUE ACUNA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 228th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1536202

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Steven Andrue Acuna, pleaded guilty to the reduced class A

misdemeanor assault charge, with an agreed punishment recommendation of sixty

days in county jail.1 In exchange for appellant’s plea, the State had agreed to reduce

1

See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.01(a)(1), (b)(1) (West 2013).

the charge from the third-degree felony offense of assault—bodily injury of a public

servant to class A misdemeanor assault.2 In accordance with his plea bargain with

the State, the trial court found appellant guilty and assessed his punishment at sixty

days’ confinement in county jail. The trial court certified that this was a plea-bargain

case and that appellant had no right of appeal, but appellant timely appealed.3 See

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), 26.2(a). The trial court appointed counsel for appellant,

who filed a notice in this Court stating that we lack jurisdiction. We dismiss this

appeal for want of jurisdiction.

In a plea-bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were

raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’s

permission to appeal. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02 (West 1977); TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the

defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. TEX. R. APP.

P. 25.2(d).

Here, the trial court’s certification is included in the clerk’s record and states

that this is a plea-bargain case and that appellant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d); Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 615. The record confirms that

2

See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 12.21(2) (West 1994).

3

Appellant’s notice of appeal from trial court cause number 1525069 has been

assigned to appellate cause number 01-17-00219-CR.

2

appellant pleaded guilty to the reduced class A misdemeanor assault charge and,

thus, supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615

(Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Shankle v. State, 119 S.W.3d 808, 813 (Tex. Crim. App.

2003) (noting that agreement to plead guilty in exchange for State’s reduction of

charge is plea bargain under Rule 25.2(a)(2)). Because appellant has no right of

appeal, we must dismiss this appeal. See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex.

Crim. App. 2006).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Bland, and Brown.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

3

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.