Opinion

William Wilborn v. Halifax Cnty (VA) School Board

  • 684 F. App'x 320
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Apr 7, 2017
Status
Unpublished
On the bench
Keenan, Wynn, Harris
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1690

WILLIAM WILBORN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HALIFAX COUNTY (VIRGINIA) SCHOOL BOARD,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at

Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:16-cv-00008-JLK-RSB)

Submitted: March 30, 2017 Decided: April 7, 2017

Before KEENAN, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melvin E. Williams, MEL WILLIAMS PLC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. R. Craig

Wood, MCGUIREWOODS LLP, Charlottesville, Virginia; Tyler S. Laughinghouse,

MCGUIREWOODS LLP, Richmond, Virginia; E. Rebecca Gantt, MCGUIREWOODS

LLP, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Wilborn appeals the district court’s order granting the Halifax County

School Board’s (“School Board”) motion to dismiss his claims as barred by Virginia’s res

judicata rule. We affirm.

Wilborn filed suit in state court against the School Board, in which he alleged a

violation of his due process rights and breach of contract following the School Board’s

decision to terminate his employment. Wilborn later nonsuited his breach-of-contract

claim. The School Board filed a demurrer, and the state court sustained the demurrer and

dismissed Wilborn’s due-process claim with prejudice. Wilborn filed a second suit against

the School Board, reasserting his previously nonsuited breach-of-contract claim and adding

two additional claims. The School Board removed the action to federal district court,

asserted a res judicata defense, and moved to dismiss the second complaint. Because

Wilborn’s claims involve the same parties and stem from the same conduct or occurrence

– his termination – we agree that Virginia’s res judicata rule bars his claims. See Va. Sup.

Ct. R. 1:6 (res judicata claim preclusion).

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilborn v.

Halifax Cty. Sch. Bd., No. 4:16-cv-00008-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. May 23, 2016). We grant

the Halifax County School Board’s motion to submit this case on the briefs because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

oral argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.