Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Court
Texas Attorney General Reports
Filed
Jul 2, 1944
Status
Published
On the bench
Grover Sellers
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

OFFICE OF THE A-ITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

AUSTIN

Honorable C. H. Cavnesa

ZLate Auditor

hlst in ( Texas

Dear Mr. Cavness:

Taxes Na-

Referenoe 13 made to

to nhich you attaohed oertaln

ofrio in oonneotlon wlth ou

What lo the of the Texas Ha-

tional Guard is it a State

y Board was oreated by

the Leglsla ture alter eflo of the State

t is an agenoy 0r the State lt

aving an ln~lvlduality separate

e acoomplishment or the purposes

Art. SSQOb, V.~k. 0. 9.; ‘MIBS

he .above mentioned~ Eouston Light .Cuard

tion, Ino. property belong on the books

General’s Department .or should, It be re-

ok3 of the Texas National Guard Armory

House Coacurrept Resolution No. 30 as adopted by the

46th J,egislature, 1939; acoepted on behalf of the State the proy-

erty of the Houston Llpht c%mrd Veterans Asaooiation, InO. iOr

the use anti banefit of the Houston Light Guard, now besfgnated

693

Honorable C. II. Cavness, page 2

as a0qiany c:, One Hundred and Forty-third Infantry. The eo-

ceptanae of the deed to this property vested title In the

State. Tha Resolution provided that the deed be delivered

to the Jdjutent reneral, and that the buildinp. be deslmated

as a Texas Natianal Guard ,‘rmory. ‘Vie are of the opJ.nicn the,.

tba Instruments or oonveyanoe abould be kel:,t in the custody

or the :,dJutant Ceneral’n Department aa is provided ii: .:ectlon

2 or .:rt. 6890b, whioh Is as r0ii0w8:

*3eo. 3. As and when any of the property owned

by the F!oard shall be fully peId far, iree of all

liens, and all debts and other oblfgatisns lnourred

in oonneatlon with the aoquisltlon or oaaatruotlcin of

suob property have been fully paid, the Roard shell

dormte, transfer and convey auoh property, by appro-

prfets instrument8 of transier and oonveyenoe, to the

State of Texas, and suob instruments of transfer and

conveyanoe shall be kept In the custody of the kdju-

tant General*s Department.”

-3. %hen the 36th Dlvislon Aviation Airport and

Ahwry property has been paid for In full, should this

property be recorded on the books of the Adjutant Cen-

eral’s Department or should It be recorded on the books

of the Texas National Guard Armory Board?

“4. Bar the further guldanoe of all aoneerned,

should land and buildings aoqulred or constructed by

funds expended by the Texas NatIonal Guard Armory E&bard

upon final payment., be recorded on the books or the Ad-

jutant General’s Department or the Texas National Guard

Armory Board?*

The provlslons 0r Sec. 3 of Art. 5890b oontrol In this

oaae also. “rhen the property Is fully pald for, It must be trans-

ferred to the State at’provided by law; and the instruments Or

conveyanoe must be kept In the custody of the Adjutant General’s

Department.

Our dIscussIon- of your iIfth question will be applioable

to these questtons else.

*5. 1.1 the event t&at any of the 9rIIiDry property

croduoes inoome, wbiob is the 0856 with the AirFOrt prop-

erty, as some of the hangers ware leased to the PxaniSi

.,.

..

fX%?

Honorable C. Ii. Cavness, pspe 3

Airways Corporation, also to tbs C. A. ,A., should

suah revenue revert to the Adjutant General’s De-

-partmsnt 3r tc f!;e TexaE Notional fuard !mnory Foard

after suoh properties have been fully paid Sor and

deraied to the .,tste of Texas?”

As we vie* the Texre National Guard irmory Eoard Act

in relation to your questions, we sre of the opinion that the

Leplslature InteMded the Act to have a duel purpose.

The first purpose was to oreate an s~cncy, in the ab-

senoe of an existing aionay, with authority to oooperste with

the United :%tetes Government, by securing available federal

funds to construot National Guard Armrles in the State. By

subsequent amendments the Board was Riven almost unlimited

power to scooapllsh this purpose.

TW seoond purpose of the Act in effect made the Armory

Board the managing agenoy of the Stste in respect to al: Texas

National Guard property. Seation 2 of the Aot provided that the

Roard have ohsrpe of the malntensnoe end operation of all Texas

National Guard ‘rrmorles, end all other property and equipment

necessary or usetul in co::.neotlon with them.

The two purposes, as we have expressed them, are not

in confllot.

In oonnaotlon with this disoussion we refer to our

Opinion No. O-5695, when we held that the Armory Board was

authorized to keep, the Income derived from the rental oi the

Houston Airport prc:perty. That property was aoqulred snd lm-

provements msde throvh oooperstlon with federal a&eacles. The

Armory Eoard borrowed money to furnish the State's part of the

east. The rents and revenuers were pledged as seourity. At

such tims ar. that property, or any other in like oondltlon, be-

comes free and clear of ali debt8 and lnoumbranoes, it Is then

to be trensferred to the Ststs by approprlnta instruments of oon-

veyanoe as provided for in :;eotion 3 of the Act. I!‘hen the oon-

vcyexme is effected the status of the Armory Board, in respect to

the particular property, Is changed from owner to that of manap-

lng a rent, and as aoh the Board must manac.e, control and maln-

tuln the property for the use end benefit of thn Texss National

Guard.

,khen ttiri change ot status occurs, It is our opinion

that, in the absenaa of an eripress provision in the :mnOry Boerd

695

Honorable 0, B. Cavne66, page 4

Aot, any fumls 6erived from the renting OS the property tra.tu-

fsrred to the Stats mnat be held by the Armory Board pending

dlspoaltlon of suoh funds by en appropriate Act or the Legl~-

lature.

In this later statue as Managing Agent ror t&e State,

the Armory Board la dependent on legislative appropriations for

funds to manage, maintain and operate Texas Rational Guard Armor-

lea, stablea, hangers and other property rued in oonneotlon with

them.

The raoorde of the Adjutant General's Department should

refleot ownership in the State of all property irae of debt. Suoh

property should be oarrlsd on the booka of the Armory Board in a

proper manner refleotlng maintenanoe and operating oosta.

"6. Is thare any atatate or lam requiring that

the Adjutant General's Dapartxi4nt or the Texas Rational

Guard Armory Board submit any and all leases, deeds;

and other instruments to the Attorney General for ap-

proval?*

The Conatltutlon of Texas established the oftloe of At-

torney Gmmral and prescribed the dotlea of the'offloe. Art. 4,

Sea. 22. Under the General Laws of Texne, Art. 4399, V.'A.'U. 5.

it 18 provided that the offloo of Attorney General be avallablr

to render logal 4sslatanoe to departments of Government.

~~.~ Khlle we do not know of 4 general law,rsquirlng the Ad-

jut4nt General's Department or the Armory DoaTd to submit the ln-

Hruments mentioned in your question to the Attorney General for

,approval, the leg41 e4rvloe4 of this department are available to

those departments in suoh instenoe, and others; and-to other de-

DerQsants of the State 48 wsZ1.

Iu aocordanoe with your reqaeat we 414 returning to the

offloa of the Adjutant General the three dooumants lleted below:

"1. Rssoliitlon of Rouston Light Guard Veterans

Assooiatlon, Ino., authorizing transfer of prop4rty

to State of Texas.

v2. Photo6tatio copy of House Concurrent Resolu-

tion No. 30.

696

Hmorable 0. B. Cavne68, pa&e 5

“3. Deed from the Howton Light Guard Vetarane

Assoalatlon, Ino., to the State of Texas."

Yours very truly

ATTORNXYGiiNFJUL OF TEXA

:. ...:>;s~,

Aasiatant

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.