Opinion

Hill v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Court
United States Court of Federal Claims
Filed
Feb 15, 2017
Status
Unpublished
On the bench
Nora Beth Dorsey
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 16-771V

Filed: October 28, 2016

UNPUBLISHED

****************************

KIMBERLY HILL, *

*

Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

v. * Influenza;

* Shoulder Injury; SIRVA;

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

****************************

Jeffrey S. Pop, Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates, Beverly Hills, CA, for petitioner.

Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for

respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On June 29, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the “Vaccine

Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine

administration (“SIRVA”) following her December 15, 2015, influenza vaccination.

Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of

Special Masters.

On October 28, 2016, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) report in which she

concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule

4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent “has concluded that petitioner’s alleged injury

is consistent with shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA), and that it

was caused-in-fact by the flu vaccine she received on December 15, 2015.” Id. at 7.

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §

300aa (2012).

Respondent further agrees that no other cause of petitioner’s injury was identified, that

she suffered sequela of her injury for more than six months, and that she has satisfied

all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Vaccine Act. Id.

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, the

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

Chief Special Master

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.