Opinion

Anthony Simon v. Kaytron Patric Curlin

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
Nov 10, 2016
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Opinion issued November 10, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-16-00361-CV

———————————

ANTHONY SIMON, Appellant

V.

KAYTRON PATRIC CURLIN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 312th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2015-13089

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Anthony Simon, has neither paid the required fees nor established

indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1, 37.3(b); see

also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041(1) (West 2013),

§ 101.0411 (West Supp. 2016); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme

Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on

Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). After

being notified by this Court’s Order and Notice of Intent to Dismiss for Want of

Prosecution on September 8, 2016, that this appeal was subject to dismissal for want

of prosecution for failure to pay the required fees, appellant did not timely respond.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and

for want of prosecution. See id. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c). We dismiss any pending

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Brown.

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.