noting generally right to appeal is limited to appeal from final judgment
How later courts described this case
- noting generally right to appeal is limited to appeal from final judgment
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Opinion issued November 1, 2016
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-16-00097-CR
———————————
CARLOS ISMAEL ROJAS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 184th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 866164
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In 2002, a jury found appellant, Carlos Ismael Rojas, guilty of the felony
offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child and assessed his punishment at
confinement for life. See Rojas v. State, No. 01-02-00262-CR, 2003 WL 253612
(Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 6, 2003, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated
for publication) (affirming conviction). In November 2009, appellant filed in the
trial court a pro se “Motion For Trial Records At County Expense.” And on
December 11, 2009, he filed a pro se notice of appeal of “the denial by operation of
law” of his motion requesting the trial court records.1 On February 17, 2010, the
trial court signed an order denying the motion.
We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
The right to appeal in a criminal case is a statutorily created right. TEX. CODE
CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02 (West 2006); Bayless v. State, 91 S.W.3d 801, 805 (Tex.
Crim. App. 2002); see State v. Sellers, 790 S.W.2d 316, 321 n.4 (Tex. Crim. App.
1990) (noting generally right to appeal is limited to appeal from final judgment).
We do not have jurisdiction to consider an appeal from an order denying a request
for a copy of a trial court record when, as here, the request is not presented in
conjunction with a timely-filed direct appeal.2 Self v. State, 122 S.W.3d 294, 294–
95 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2003, no pet.) (citing Everett v. State, 91 S.W.3d 386, 386
(Tex. App.—Waco 2002, no pet.)); see Hosea v. State, No. 01-14-01017-CR, 2015
WL 831997, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 26, 2015, no pet.) (mem.
1
The clerk’s record filed in this appeal includes a deputy trial court clerk’s affidavit
stating that the notice of appeal, filed on December 11, 2009, “was not turned in for
processing by the appellate division until January 22, 2016.”
2
The trial court clerk has notified the Clerk of this Court that appellant “received . . .
his clerk’s record on 2/22/16.”
2
op., not designated for publication) (“The denial of a motion to obtain a free record
is not an appealable order.”) (internal quotations omitted).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Brown.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
3