The opinion
ACCEPTED
03-13-00790-CV
8101329
THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
AUSTIN, TEXAS
12/4/2015 4:07:29 PM
JEFFREY D. KYLE
CLERK
No. 03-13-00790-CV
FILED IN
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 3rd COURT OF APPEALS
AUSTIN, TEXAS
12/4/2015 4:07:29 PM
FOR THE THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JEFFREY D. KYLE
Clerk
AT AUSTIN
T. MARK ANDERSON AND CHRISTINE ANDERSON, AS CO-
EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF TED ANDERSON
Appellants/Cross-Appellees,
v.
RICHARD T. ARCHER, DAVID B. ARCHER, CAROL ARCHER BUGG,
JOHN V. ARCHER, KAREN ARCHER BALL, AND SHERRI ARCHER
Appellees/Cross-Appellants.
APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS’ OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE CROSS-APPELLEES’ BRIEF AND
APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE
CROSS-APPELLEES’ BRIEF
Laurie Ratliff
State Bar No. 00784817
Frank N. Ikard, Jr.
State Bar No. 10386000
IKARD GOLDEN JONES P.C.
400 W. 15th St., Suite 975
Austin, Texas 78701
Telephone: (512) 472-6695
Telecopier: (512) 472-3669
laurieratliff@igjlaw.com
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS
NO. 03-13-00790-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AUSTIN
T. MARK ANDERSON AND CHRISTINE ANDERSON, AS CO-
EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF TED ANDERSON
Appellants/Cross-Appellees,
v.
RICHARD T. ARCHER, DAVID B. ARCHER, CAROL ARCHER BUGG,
JOHN V. ARCHER, KAREN ARCHER BALL, AND SHERRI ARCHER
Appellees/Cross-Appellants.
APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS’ OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE CROSS-APPELLEES’ BRIEF AND
APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE
CROSS-APPELLEES’ BRIEF
TO THE HONORABLE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS:
Appellees/Cross-Appellants, Richard T. Archer, David B. Archer, Carol
Archer Bugg, John V. Archer, Karen Archer Ball, and Sherri Archer (the Archer
Family), respectfully file their Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Cross-
Appellees’ Brief and their Motion to Strike Cross-Appellees’ Brief and request that
2
the Court deny the motion for leave and strike the brief submitted on December 3,
2015.
Introduction
A substitution of counsel is not authorization to resurrect long-passed
deadlines. The Rules of Appellate Procedure do not provide for, and this Court
should not permit, a more than nine-month extension of time by granting a motion
for leave. Cross-Appellees’ brief in this case was initially due March 9, 2015.
Cross-Appellees offer no evidence, no good cause, and no reasonable explanation
(other than the filing of a motion to substitute counsel) for allowing them to avoid
the clear deadlines in the rules. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b) (appellee’s brief due 30
days after appellant’s brief is filed).
To grant Cross-Appellees’ eleventh-hour motion for leave to file a brief nine
months after the deadline—when Cross-Appellees intentionally chose not to file a
brief—turns the deadlines in Rule 38.6 on their head.
I. Cross-Appellees offer no reason for the Court to reverse its earlier orders
on this very issue.
This Court has addressed the failure of Cross-Appellees to file a brief on three
previous occasions. On all three occasions, this Court ordered the appeal to be
submitted without a Cross-Appellees’ brief. In their motion for leave, Cross-
Appellees offer no reason for this Court to reverse these prior orders.
3
First, the Court ordered the case to be submitted without Cross-Appellees’
brief after Cross-Appellees chose not to file their brief.
Appellants filed their opening brief on November 6, 2014. On February 6,
2015, the Archer Family filed their combined brief, responding to Appellants’ issues
and also raising issues on cross-appeal. Cross-Appellees’ brief was due March 9,
2015. Ex. A. Cross-Appellees requested, and this Court granted, three extensions
of time to file Cross-Appellees’ brief. Exs. B, C, & D.
Despite the three extensions of time, Cross-Appellees, one of whom is a
double-board certified attorney, chose not to respond to the Archer Family’s cross-
appeal. Ex. E, F, & Court’s website (indicating “brief was not filed” as of May 27,
2015).
With no Cross-Appellees’ brief filed, the Court placed the case on its ready
docket with the briefs on file as of May 27, 2015 and dismissed Cross-Appellees’
fourth motion for extension of time as moot. Ex. G & Court’s website (indicating
case “ready to be set” as of May 27, 2015).
The Court next considered Cross-Appellees’ failure to file a brief in the
Archer Family’s Motion to Allocate Time for Oral Argument. See TEX. R. APP. P.
39.1 (limiting oral argument to parties who have filed a brief); 39.2 (purpose of oral
argument is to emphasize and clarify written arguments in the brief); & 39.6 (court
may allow oral argument when only one party has filed a brief). The Court granted
4
the Archer Family’s motion and, because no Cross-Appellees’ brief was filed, the
Court allocated oral argument time without permitting a response to the cross appeal.
Ex. H.
Finally, on December 3, 2015, the Court considered the Cross-Appellees’
failure to file a brief. In its December 3, 2015 notice of setting the case for oral
argument for January 27, 2016, the Court again ordered that oral argument time will
be allocated without permitting a response to the cross appeal. Ex. I.
Cross-Appellees offer no explanation why this Court should reverse its earlier
orders. Accordingly, this Court’s prior orders to submit the case without a Cross-
Appellees’ brief compel this Court to deny the motion for leave.
II. Cross-Appellees offer no legal support and no reasonable explanation for
filing a brief nine months after the initial deadline.
Notwithstanding the Court’s prior orders to submit with case without Cross-
Appellees’ brief, none of Cross-Appellees’ excuses support this Court granting leave
to file a brief that is nine months late.
First, Cross-Appellees’ primary argument for allowing them to circumvent
Rule 38.6(b) and file their Cross-Appellees’ brief nine months after the initial
deadline is that they substituted counsel. A substituting attorney, however, takes the
case and deadlines as he finds them. That Cross-Appellees substituted counsel long
after the Court designated the case as “ready to be set” does not support modifying
the briefing deadlines in the rules. Nothing in the rules permits a substitution of
5
counsel to restart long-expired deadlines. Otherwise, the deadlines in Rule 38.6 have
no meaning.
Second, Cross-Appellees offer no reasonable explanation for their failure to
file a cross-appellees’ brief during the relevant time period. Cross-Appellees’ brief
was initially due on March 9, and by extensions, as late as May 8, 2015. Nowhere
in Cross-Appellees’ motion for leave do they explain or even mention the March
through May 2015 time period when their brief was due, but not filed. Instead,
Cross-Appellees rely on an August 2015 purported health issue of their prior
counsel.
Third, Cross-Appellees rely on this purported health issue of their prior
counsel to support their motion for leave. Mot. at p. 2. Prior counsel’s purported
health issue in August 2015 (that was used to postpone the previous oral argument
setting of September 2, 2015), however, does not explain Cross-Appellees’ failure
to timely file a brief during March through May of 2015. Mot. at 2; Ex. J.
Further, contrary to Cross-Appellees’ characterization, their prior counsel’s
health in August 2015 has no bearing on the March through May 2015 time period
when the Cross-Appellees’ brief was due. In fact, Cross-Appellees’ prior counsel’s
purported health condition that was used to delay submission of this case is expressly
prospective. Ex. K. Cross-Appellees’ prior counsel’s motion states that he, “has
personal health conditions which have become disabling and incompatible with
6
continuation of proper representation of Movants herein.” Ex. K (Mot. for
Continuance at p.1) (emphasis added). The health excuse states nothing about prior
counsel’s purported health condition five months before when Cross-Appellees’
brief was due, but not filed. Even if prior counsel’s purported health had any bearing
on this issue, why is it only being raised nine months after the deadline?
Accordingly, Cross-Appellees allegation of “good cause” does not support the
motion for leave to file a brief nine months after the initial deadline.
Fourth, Cross-Appellees contend that this Court will “benefit” from a cross-
appellees’ brief. Mot. at p.2. No one deprived Cross-Appellees of their opportunity
to “benefit” the Court with a brief responding to the cross appeal. Quite the contrary:
the Court gave Cross-Appellees every opportunity to file their Cross-Appellees’
brief by granting three extensions of time. That Cross-Appellees, one of whom is a
double-board certified attorney, chose not to file a cross-appellees’ brief is not an
excuse to now justify a motion for leave to file a brief nine months after the deadline.
Cross-Appellees had the opportunity to file a brief; they simply chose not to do so.
Finally, Cross-Appellees make the absurd statement that the Archers are not
harmed by their filing of a brief nine months after the initial deadline. To the
contrary, the Archer Family is harmed by this eleventh-hour attempt to file a brief
that is not contemplated by the rules. Rule 38.6 provides for specific deadlines for
filing briefs. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6. The Archers have complied with those briefing
7
deadlines. Cross-Appellees, despite three extensions, chose not to abide by the
briefing deadlines. Because Cross-Appellees chose not to file a cross-appellees’
brief, and as this Court has already ordered three times, the Archer Family’s cross
appeal proceeds unanswered and without Cross-Appellees’ brief. Allowing Cross-
Appellees to now file a brief under these circumstances causes the Archer Family
harm.
Further, if the Court grants the motion for leave, the Archer Family is harmed
by the obligation to file a reply brief responding to Cross-Appellees’ brief.
Accordingly, the Archer Family requests that this Court deny the motion for
leave, adhere to the Court’s earlier orders on Cross-Appellees’ brief, and submit the
case for oral argument without Cross-Appellees’ brief.
III. The Court should strike Cross-Appellees’ brief submitted December 3,
2015.
With their motion for leave, Cross-Appellees submitted their Cross-
Appellees’ brief to the Court on December 3, 2015. Because there is no basis for
the motion for leave, this Court should strike Cross-Appellees’ brief. Accordingly,
the Archer Family requests that the Court grant their motion to strike and not
consider the previously submitted Cross-Appellees’ brief.
For these reasons, Appellees/Cross-Appellants Richard T. Archer, David B.
Archer, Carol Archer Bugg, John V. Archer, Karen Archer Ball, and Sherri Archer
respectfully request that this Court deny Cross-Appellees’ Motion for Leave to File
8
Cross-Appellees’ Brief, grant their Motion to Strike and strike and not consider the
Cross-Appellees’ brief that was submitted on December 3, 2015. The Archer Family
prays for such other and further relief to which they may be entitled.
Respectfully submitted,
IKARD GOLDEN JONES, P.C.
/s/ Laurie Ratliff
Laurie Ratliff
State Bar No. 00784817
Frank N. Ikard, Jr.
State Bar No. 10386000
400 West 15th Street, Suite 975
Austin, Texas 78701
Telephone: (512) 472-6695
Telecopier: (512) 472-3669
laurieratliff@igjlaw.com
ATTORNEYS FOR
APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS
RICHARD T. ARCHER, DAVID B. ARCHER,
CAROL ARCHER BUGG, JOHN V. ARCHER,
KAREN ARCHER BALL AND SHERRI ARCHER
9
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on the date listed below a copy of Appellees/Cross-
Appellants’ Response in Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Cross-Appellees’
Brief and Appellees/Cross-Appellants’ Motion to Strike Cross-Appellees’ Brief was
served on the counsel of record listed below via electronic delivery in accordance
with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure on this 4th day of December 2015:
Via e-service file and email
Scott R. Kidd
KIDD LAW FIRM
819 West 11th
Austin, Texas 78701
Attorneys for Appellants/Cross-Appellees
T. Mark Anderson and Christine Anderson
/s/ Laurie Ratliff
Laurie Ratliff
t:\archer 3 2007 tortious interference\appeal\motions\response opposing motion for leave to file cross-
appellees' brief.docx
10
Appellees/Cross-Appellants’
Opposition to Motion for Leave to File
Cross-Appellees’ Brief and
Appellees/Cross-Appellants’ Motion to
Strike Cross-Appellees’ Brief
Exhibit A
FILE COPY
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS
P.O. BOX 12547, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2547
www.txcourts.gov/3rdcoa.aspx
(512) 463-1733
JEFF L. ROSE, CHIEF JUSTICE JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK
DAVID PURYEAR, JUSTICE
BOB PEMBERTON, JUSTICE
MELISSA GOODWIN, JUSTICE
SCOTT K. FIELD, JUSTICE
CINDY OLSON BOURLAND, JUSTICE
February 13, 2015
Mr. Gerald D. McFarlen Ms. Laurie Ratliff
28 Fabra Oaks Road Ikard Golden Jones, P.C.
Boerne, TX 78006-2831 400 West 15th Street, Suite 975
* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Austin, TX 78701
* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
RE: Court of Appeals Number: 03-13-00790-CV
Trial Court Case Number: D-1-GN-07-002328
Style: Appellants, T. Mark Anderson, as Co-Executor of the Estate of Ted Anderson, and
Christine Anderson, as Co-Executor of the Estate of Ted Anderson// Cross-Appellants,
David R. Archer, Carol Archer Bugg, John V. Archer, Karen Archer Ball, and Sherri
Archer
v.
Appellees, Richard T. Archer, David R. Archer, Carol Archer Bugg, John V. Archer,
Karen Archer Ball, and Sherri Archer// Cross-Appellees,T. Mark Anderson, individually
and as Co-Executor of the Estate of Ted Anderson, Christine Anderson
Dear Counsel:
Please disregard this Court’s notice dated February 12, 2015. Brief of appellees and cross-
appellants’ was filed in this Court on February 6, 2015. Accordingly, cross-appellees’ brief is due
on or before March 9, 2015.
Very truly yours,
JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK
BY: F. Hewtty
Frances Hewtty, Deputy Clerk
Appellees/Cross-Appellants’
Opposition to Motion for Leave to File
Cross-Appellees’ Brief and
Appellees/Cross-Appellants’ Motion to
Strike Cross-Appellees’ Brief
Exhibit B
FILE COPY
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS
P.O. BOX 12547, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2547
www.txcourts.gov/3rdcoa.aspx
(512) 463-1733
JEFF L. ROSE, CHIEF JUSTICE JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK
DAVID PURYEAR, JUSTICE
BOB PEMBERTON, JUSTICE
MELISSA GOODWIN, JUSTICE
SCOTT K. FIELD, JUSTICE
CINDY OLSON BOURLAND, JUSTICE
March 10, 2015
Mr. Gerald D. McFarlen Ms. Laurie Ratliff
28 Fabra Oaks Road Ikard Golden Jones, P.C.
Boerne, TX 78006-2831 400 West 15th Street, Suite 975
* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Austin, TX 78701
* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
RE: Court of Appeals Number: 03-13-00790-CV
Trial Court Case Number: D-1-GN-07-002328
Style: Appellants, T. Mark Anderson, as Co-Executor of the Estate of Ted Anderson, and
Christine Anderson, as Co-Executor of the Estate of Ted Anderson// Cross-Appellants,
David R. Archer, Carol Archer Bugg, John V. Archer, Karen Archer Ball, and Sherri
Archer
v. Appellees, Richard T. Archer, David R. Archer, Carol Archer Bugg, John V. Archer,
Karen Archer Ball, and Sherri Archer// Cross-Appellees,T. Mark Anderson,
individually and as Co-Executor of the Estate of Ted Anderson, Christine Anderson
Dear Counsel:
Cross-appellees' motion for extension of time to file brief was granted by this Court on the
date noted above. The deadline for filing cross-appellees' brief is extended to March 23, 2015.
Very truly yours,
JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK
BY: E. Talerico
Liz Talerico, Deputy Clerk
Appellees/Cross-Appellants’
Opposition to Motion for Leave to File
Cross-Appellees’ Brief and
Appellees/Cross-Appellants’ Motion to
Strike Cross-Appellees’ Brief
Exhibit C
FILE COPY
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS
P.O. BOX 12547, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2547
www.txcourts.gov/3rdcoa.aspx
(512) 463-1733
JEFF L. ROSE, CHIEF JUSTICE JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK
DAVID PURYEAR, JUSTICE
BOB PEMBERTON, JUSTICE
MELISSA GOODWIN, JUSTICE
SCOTT K. FIELD, JUSTICE
CINDY OLSON BOURLAND, JUSTICE
April 7, 2015
Mr. Gerald D. McFarlen Ms. Laurie Ratliff
28 Fabra Oaks Road Ikard Golden Jones, P.C.
Boerne, TX 78006-2831 400 West 15th Street, Suite 975
* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Austin, TX 78701
* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
RE: Court of Appeals Number: 03-13-00790-CV
Trial Court Case Number: D-1-GN-07-002328
Style: Appellants, T. Mark Anderson, as Co-Executor of the Estate of Ted Anderson, and
Christine Anderson, as Co-Executor of the Estate of Ted Anderson// Cross-Appellants,
David R. Archer, Carol Archer Bugg, John V. Archer, Karen Archer Ball, and Sherri
Archer
v. Appellees, Richard T. Archer, David R. Archer, Carol Archer Bugg, John V. Archer,
Karen Archer Ball, and Sherri Archer// Cross-Appellees,T. Mark Anderson,
individually and as Co-Executor of the Estate of Ted Anderson, Christine Anderson
Dear Counsel:
Cross-appellees' motion for extension of time to file brief was granted by this Court on the
date noted above. The deadline for filing cross-appellees' brief is extended to April 10, 2015.
Very truly yours,
JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK
BY: E. Talerico
Liz Talerico, Deputy Clerk
Appellees/Cross-Appellants’
Opposition to Motion for Leave to File
Cross-Appellees’ Brief and
Appellees/Cross-Appellants’ Motion to
Strike Cross-Appellees’ Brief
Exhibit D
FILE COPY
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS
P.O. BOX 12547, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2547
www.txcourts.gov/3rdcoa.aspx
(512) 463-1733
JEFF L. ROSE, CHIEF JUSTICE JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK
DAVID PURYEAR, JUSTICE
BOB PEMBERTON, JUSTICE
MELISSA GOODWIN, JUSTICE
SCOTT K. FIELD, JUSTICE
CINDY OLSON BOURLAND, JUSTICE
April 13, 2015
Mr. Gerald D. McFarlen Ms. Laurie Ratliff
28 Fabra Oaks Road Ikard Golden Jones, P.C.
Boerne, TX 78006-2831 400 West 15th Street, Suite 975
* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Austin, TX 78701
* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
RE: Court of Appeals Number: 03-13-00790-CV
Trial Court Case Number: D-1-GN-07-002328
Style: Appellants, T. Mark Anderson, as Co-Executor of the Estate of Ted Anderson, and
Christine Anderson, as Co-Executor of the Estate of Ted Anderson// Cross-Appellants,
David R. Archer, Carol Archer Bugg, John V. Archer, Karen Archer Ball, and Sherri
Archer
v. Appellees, Richard T. Archer, David R. Archer, Carol Archer Bugg, John V. Archer,
Karen Archer Ball, and Sherri Archer// Cross-Appellees,T. Mark Anderson,
individually and as Co-Executor of the Estate of Ted Anderson, Christine Anderson
Dear Counsel:
Cross-appellees' motion for extension of time to file brief was granted by this Court on the
date noted above. The deadline for filing cross-appellees' brief is extended to April 17, 2015.
Very truly yours,
JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK
BY: E. Talerico
Liz Talerico, Deputy Clerk
Appellees/Cross-Appellants’
Opposition to Motion for Leave to File
Cross-Appellees’ Brief and
Appellees/Cross-Appellants’ Motion to
Strike Cross-Appellees’ Brief
Exhibit E
FILE COPY
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS
P.O. BOX 12547, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2547
www.txcourts.gov/3rdcoa.aspx
(512) 463-1733
JEFF L. ROSE, CHIEF JUSTICE JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK
DAVID PURYEAR, JUSTICE
BOB PEMBERTON, JUSTICE
MELISSA GOODWIN, JUSTICE
SCOTT K. FIELD, JUSTICE
CINDY OLSON BOURLAND, JUSTICE
April 27, 2015
Mr. Gerald D. McFarlen
28 Fabra Oaks Road
Boerne, TX 78006-2831
* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
RE: Court of Appeals Number: 03-13-00790-CV
Trial Court Case Number: D-1-GN-07-002328
Style: Appellants, T. Mark Anderson, as Co-Executor of the Estate of Ted Anderson, and
Christine Anderson, as Co-Executor of the Estate of Ted Anderson// Cross-Appellants,
David R. Archer, Carol Archer Bugg, John V. Archer, Karen Archer Ball, and Sherri
Archer
v. Appellees, Richard T. Archer, David R. Archer, Carol Archer Bugg, John V. Archer,
Karen Archer Ball, and Sherri Archer// Cross-Appellees,T. Mark Anderson,
individually and as Co-Executor of the Estate of Ted Anderson, Christine Anderson
Dear Counsel:
Cross-Appellees’ brief was due in this Court on April 17, 2015, and is overdue. See Tex. R.
App. P. 38.6. If this Court does not receive Cross-Appellees’ brief on or before Friday, May 08,
2015, this cause may be submitted on appellants’ and appellees/cross appellants’ briefs alone.
Further motions for extension of time may not be considered.
Very truly yours,
Jeffrey D. Kyle
JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK
cc: Ms. Laurie Ratliff
Appellees/Cross-Appellants’
Opposition to Motion for Leave to File
Cross-Appellees’ Brief and
Appellees/Cross-Appellants’ Motion to
Strike Cross-Appellees’ Brief
Exhibit F
TBLS Online Attorney Directory http://www.tbls.org/Directory/Attorney.aspx
Search
?
Search Results
Name Firm / Organization Specialization
Mr. T. Mark Anderson T. Mark Anderson, P.C. 1996 Real Estate Law - Commercial
Mr. T. Mark Anderson T. Mark Anderson, P.C. 1996 Real Estate Law - Residential
Texas Board of Legal Specialization, 505 E. Huntland Dr., Ste. 400, LB 28, Austin, TX 78752 • 1-855-277-TBLS(8257)
Copyright © 2015 Texas Board of Legal Specialization
1 of 1 12/4/2015 3:37 PM
Appellees/Cross-Appellants’
Opposition to Motion for Leave to File
Cross-Appellees’ Brief and
Appellees/Cross-Appellants’ Motion to
Strike Cross-Appellees’ Brief
Exhibit G
FILE COPY
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS
P.O. BOX 12547, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2547
www.txcourts.gov/3rdcoa.aspx
(512) 463-1733
JEFF L. ROSE, CHIEF JUSTICE JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK
DAVID PURYEAR, JUSTICE
BOB PEMBERTON, JUSTICE
MELISSA GOODWIN, JUSTICE
SCOTT K. FIELD, JUSTICE
CINDY OLSON BOURLAND, JUSTICE
May 27, 2015
Mr. Gerald D. McFarlen Ms. Laurie Ratliff
The Law Office of Gerald D. McFarlen, PC Ikard Golden Jones, P.C.
28 Fabra Oaks Road 400 West 15th Street, Suite 975
Boerne, TX 78006-2831 Austin, TX 78701
* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
RE: Court of Appeals Number: 03-13-00790-CV
Trial Court Case Number: D-1-GN-07-002328
Style: Appellants, T. Mark Anderson, as Co-Executor of the Estate of Ted Anderson, and
Christine Anderson, as Co-Executor of the Estate of Ted Anderson// Cross-Appellants,
David R. Archer, Carol Archer Bugg, John V. Archer, Karen Archer Ball, and Sherri
Archer
v.
Appellees, Richard T. Archer, David R. Archer, Carol Archer Bugg, John V. Archer,
Karen Archer Ball, and Sherri Archer// Cross-Appellees,T. Mark Anderson,
individually and as Co-Executor of the Estate of Ted Anderson, Christine Anderson
Dear Counsel:
On the date noted above, cross-appellees' Fourth Motion to Extend Time to File Brief
was dismissed as moot by this Court.
Very truly yours,
JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK
BY: F. Hewtty
Frances Hewtty, Deputy Clerk
Appellees/Cross-Appellants’
Opposition to Motion for Leave to File
Cross-Appellees’ Brief and
Appellees/Cross-Appellants’ Motion to
Strike Cross-Appellees’ Brief
Exhibit H
FILE COPY
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS
P.O. BOX 12547, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2547
www.txcourts.gov/3rdcoa.aspx
(512) 463-1733
JEFF L. ROSE, CHIEF JUSTICE JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK
DAVID PURYEAR, JUSTICE
BOB PEMBERTON, JUSTICE
MELISSA GOODWIN, JUSTICE
SCOTT K. FIELD, JUSTICE
CINDY OLSON BOURLAND, JUSTICE
August 26, 2015
Mr. Gerald D. McFarlen Ms. Laurie Ratliff
The Law Office of Gerald D. McFarlen, PC Ikard Golden Jones, P.C.
28 Fabra Oaks Road 400 West 15th Street, Suite 975
Boerne, TX 78006-2831 Austin, TX 78701
* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
RE: Court of Appeals Number: 03-13-00790-CV
Trial Court Case Number: D-1-GN-07-002328
Style: Appellants, T. Mark Anderson, as Co-Executor of the Estate of Ted Anderson, and
Christine Anderson, as Co-Executor of the Estate of Ted Anderson// Cross-Appellants,
David R. Archer, Carol Archer Bugg, John V. Archer, Karen Archer Ball, and Sherri
Archer
v. Appellees, Richard T. Archer, David R. Archer, Carol Archer Bugg, John V. Archer,
Karen Archer Ball, and Sherri Archer// Cross-Appellees,T. Mark Anderson,
individually and as Co-Executor of the Estate of Ted Anderson, Christine Anderson
Dear Counsel:
Appellees/Cross-Appellants' Motion to Allocate Time for Oral Argument was granted by
this Court on the date noted above. Accordingly, time at oral argument will be allocated in the
following manner: 15 minutes for appellants’ opening; 15 minutes for appellees’ response; 5
minutes for appellants’ rebuttal; and 5 minutes for appellees/cross-appellants’ issues on cross-
appeal.
Very truly yours,
JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK
BY: E. Talerico
Liz Talerico, Deputy Clerk
Appellees/Cross-Appellants’
Opposition to Motion for Leave to File
Cross-Appellees’ Brief and
Appellees/Cross-Appellants’ Motion to
Strike Cross-Appellees’ Brief
Exhibit I
FILE COPY
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS
P.O. BOX 12547, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2547
www.txcourts.gov/3rdcoa.aspx
(512) 463-1733
JEFF L. ROSE, CHIEF JUSTICE JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK
DAVID PURYEAR, JUSTICE
BOB PEMBERTON, JUSTICE
MELISSA GOODWIN, JUSTICE
SCOTT K. FIELD, JUSTICE
CINDY OLSON BOURLAND, JUSTICE
December 3, 2015
Ms. Laurie Ratliff Mr. Scott R. Kidd
Ikard Golden Jones, P.C. Kidd Law Firm
400 West 15th Street, Suite 975 819 West 11th Street
Austin, TX 78701 Austin, TX 78701
* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
RE: Court of Appeals Number: 03-13-00790-CV
Trial Court Case Number: D-1-GN-07-002328
Style: Appellants, T. Mark Anderson, as Co-Executor of the Estate of Ted Anderson, and
Christine Anderson, as Co-Executor of the Estate of Ted Anderson// Cross-Appellants,
David R. Archer, Carol Archer Bugg, John V. Archer, Karen Archer Ball, and Sherri
Archer
v. Appellees, Richard T. Archer, David R. Archer, Carol Archer Bugg, John V. Archer,
Karen Archer Ball, and Sherri Archer// Cross-Appellees,T. Mark Anderson,
individually and as Co-Executor of the Estate of Ted Anderson, Christine Anderson
Dear Counsel:
You are hereby notified that the above cause has this day been set for submission and oral
argument on January 27, 2016 at 9:00 AM, before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton, and
Field. Each side will be allowed 20 minutes to argue. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. The time for oral
argument will be allocated in the following manner: 15 minutes for appellants’ opening; 15 minutes
for appellees’ response; 5 minutes for appellants’ rebuttal; and 5 minutes for appellees/cross-
appellants’ issues on cross-appeal.
Upon receipt of this letter, please notify the Clerk, in writing via your electronic service
provider, of your intention to argue this case before the Court. In the event that parties previously
requesting oral argument should decide to waive argument, this should be communicated to the
Clerk well in advance of the setting date. The Court expects counsel to appear at the stated time,
prepared to argue without undue repetition of or reading from the brief, and to respond to questions
from the bench.
Any person seeking a reasonable accommodation during oral argument for a disability must
make that request to the Court Clerk within 10 days of this letter so that appropriate arrangements
can be made.
FILE COPY
Very truly yours,
JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK
BY: E. Talerico
Liz Talerico, Deputy Clerk
Appellees/Cross-Appellants’
Opposition to Motion for Leave to File
Cross-Appellees’ Brief and
Appellees/Cross-Appellants’ Motion to
Strike Cross-Appellees’ Brief
Exhibit J
FILE COPY
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS
P.O. BOX 12547, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2547
www.txcourts.gov/3rdcoa.aspx
(512) 463-1733
JEFF L. ROSE, CHIEF JUSTICE JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK
DAVID PURYEAR, JUSTICE
BOB PEMBERTON, JUSTICE
MELISSA GOODWIN, JUSTICE
SCOTT K. FIELD, JUSTICE
CINDY OLSON BOURLAND, JUSTICE
August 4, 2015
Mr. Gerald D. McFarlen Ms. Laurie Ratliff
The Law Office of Gerald D. McFarlen, PC Ikard Golden Jones, P.C.
28 Fabra Oaks Road 400 West 15th Street, Suite 975
Boerne, TX 78006-2831 Austin, TX 78701
* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
RE: Court of Appeals Number: 03-13-00790-CV
Trial Court Case Number: D-1-GN-07-002328
Style: Appellants, T. Mark Anderson, as Co-Executor of the Estate of Ted Anderson, and
Christine Anderson, as Co-Executor of the Estate of Ted Anderson// Cross-Appellants,
David R. Archer, Carol Archer Bugg, John V. Archer, Karen Archer Ball, and Sherri
Archer
v. Appellees, Richard T. Archer, David R. Archer, Carol Archer Bugg, John V. Archer,
Karen Archer Ball, and Sherri Archer// Cross-Appellees,T. Mark Anderson,
individually and as Co-Executor of the Estate of Ted Anderson, Christine Anderson
Dear Counsel:
You are hereby notified that the above cause has this day been set for submission and oral
argument on September 2, 2015 at 9:00 AM, before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and
Field. Argument is limited to 20 minutes for appellants and for appellees. Appellants’ time
may be divided and a portion used in rebuttal.
In past cross-appeals, the standard time allotment has been: 10 minutes for appellants'
opening; 15 minutes for appellees/cross-appellants’ response and issues on cross-appeal; 10 minutes
for appellants'/cross-appellees' rebuttal and response; and 5 minutes for cross-appellants’ rebuttal.
Upon receipt of this letter, please notify the Clerk, in writing, of your intention to argue this
case before the Court. Counsel should include any alternative agreement on the division of time, if
any. In the event that parties previously requesting oral argument should decide to waive argument,
this should be communicated to the Clerk well in advance of the setting date. All attorneys in civil
and criminal cases are required to file all documents (except a document submitted under seal or
subject to a motion to seal) with the Court through the eFileTexas.gov electronic filing system.
The Court expects counsel to appear at the stated time, prepared to argue without undue
repetition of or reading from the brief, and to respond to questions from the bench.
FILE COPY
Very truly yours,
JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK
BY: E. Talerico
Liz Talerico, Deputy Clerk
Appellees/Cross-Appellants’
Opposition to Motion for Leave to File
Cross-Appellees’ Brief and
Appellees/Cross-Appellants’ Motion to
Strike Cross-Appellees’ Brief
Exhibit K
ACCEPTED
03-13-00790-CV
6711306
THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
AUSTIN, TEXAS
8/28/2015 5:29:28 PM
JEFFREY D. KYLE
CLERK
No. 03-13-00790-CV
T. Mark Anderson, § IN THE THIRD
FILED IN
as co-executor of the estate of § 3rd COURT OF APPEALS
AUSTIN, TEXAS
Ted Anderson, and §
8/28/2015 5:29:28 PM
Christine Anderson, § JEFFREY D. KYLE
as co-executor of the estate of § Clerk
Ted Anderson, Appellants §
§
v. § COURT OF APPEALS
§
Richard T. Archer, David §
B. Archer, Carol Archer §
Bugg, John V. Archer, §
Karen Archer Ball, and §
Sherri Archer, Appellees § AUSTIN, TEXAS
MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF THIS COURT:
Appellants/Cross-appellees, Movants, hereby urge the Court to continue
oral argument and submission of this case, and in support show:
1. Oral argument is set for September 2, 2015.
2. Movants seek a continuance of 30 days to allow them to retain new
counsel. Appellants’ current counsel has personal health conditions which have
become disabling and incompatible with continuation of proper representation
of Movants herein. A Motion to Withdraw is filed contemporaneously
herewith. Movants do not oppose the motion to withdraw as long as they have
a reasonable time to allow their substitute counsel opportunity to prepare.
3. This withdrawal is not sought for delay only but that justice may be done.
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
4. Movants have conferred with counsel for Appellees/Cross-
appellants in this action; and they are opposed.
5. For the above reasons, Movants request the Court to continue
submission of this case and reset oral argument for thirty days, or as soon
thereafter as the Court can hear the matter.
Respectfully submitted,
THE LAW OFFICE OF
GERALD D. MCFARLEN, PC
28 Fabra Oaks Road
Boerne, TX 78006
Phone: (830) 331-8554
Fax: (210) 568-4305
Email: gmcfarlen@mcfarlenlaw.com
BY: /s/ Gerald D. McFarlen
GERALD D. McFARLEN
State Bar No. 13604500
ATTORNEYS FOR CROSS
APPELLEES
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I do hereby certify that on the 28th day of August, 2015, a true and correct
copy of the foregoing motion was furnished to all counsel of record in accordance
with the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.
.
Laurie Ratliff
Ikard, Golden, Jones, P.C.
400 West 15th Street, Suite 975
Austin, Texas 78701
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES/CROSS APPELLANTS
/s/ Gerald D. McFarlen
GERALD D. McFARLEN