Opinion

Texas Association of Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine v. Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners And Patricia Gilbert, Executive Director in Her Official Capacity

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Filed
Oct 29, 2015
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 3.1%

The opinion

ACCEPTED

03-15-00262-CV

7603947

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

10/29/2015 3:28:53 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

No. 3-15-00262-CV

FILED IN

3rd COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

In the Court of Appeals 10/29/2015 3:28:53 PM

Third District of Texas — Austin JEFFREY D. KYLE

Clerk

TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ACUPUNCTURE AND ORIENTAL MEDICINE,

Appellant,

v.

TEXAS BOARD OF CHIROPRACTICE EXAMINERS AND YVETTE

YARBROUGH, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY,

Appellees.

On Appeal from 201st District Court, Travis County, Texas

Cause No. D-1-GN-14-000355

ACUPUNCTURE ASSOCIATION’S RESPONSE TO THE

CHIROPRACTIC BOARD’S MOTION TO STRIKE

Craig T. Enoch

Melissa A. Lorber

Shelby O’Brien

ENOCH KEVER PLLC

600 Congress Avenue, Suite 2800

Austin, Texas 78701

(512) 615-1200 / (512) 615-1198 fax

Attorneys for Appellant

1

Appellant Texas Association of Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine

(“Acupuncture Association”) files this response to Appellees Texas Board of

Chiropractic Examiners and Yvette Yarbrough, in her Official Capacity as

Executive Director of the Chiropractic Board’s (“Chiropractic Board”) motion to

strike. The Acupuncture Association requests for the Court to deny the motion.

The Chiropractic Board asks the Court to strike a laundry list of footnotes in

the Acupuncture Association’s brief: specifically, footnotes 29, 32-36, and 38-39.

These footnotes simply reference websites that are readily available to the public

on the internet. But the Chiropractic Board claims that because the cited websites

are not in the clerk’s or reporter’s records, the Acupuncture Association may not

cite them in its brief.

Links to these websites were included in the Acupuncture Association’s

brief for the Court’s reference, if the Court wishes to consult them. The question

before this Court is one of law, not one of fact that is dependent on evidence. The

Acupuncture Association is not attempting to put new evidence into the record by

1

attaching copies of documents to its appendix. Referencing internet websites in

1

See Burke v. Ins. Auto Auctions Corp., 169 S.W.3d 771, 775 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2005, pet.

denied) (“an appellate court cannot consider documents or hearings that are cited in the brief and

attached as appendices if they are not formally included in the record on appeal”) (emphasis

added); In re Estate of Bendtsen, 230 S.W.3d 823, 830 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2007, pet. denied) (a

court should not consider evidence attached to a brief that is not included in the appellate

record—such as new affidavits).

2

appellate briefs—even if hard copies of the linked documents were not put into

evidence in the trial court—is a common practice, one that the Office of the

2

Attorney General routinely follows.

Further, a court may take judicial notice of a fact that is not subject to

reasonable dispute because it “can be accurately and readily determined from

sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.” TEX. R. EVID. 201(b).

A court may take judicial notice at any state in a proceeding. Id. 201(d); see also

Pub. Util. Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm’n of Tex., 878 S.W.2d 598, 600 (Tex.

1994). Here, it cannot reasonably be questioned that these internet websites say

what they say. Indeed, the Chiropractic Board does not even attempt to question

these websites’ accuracy. The cited websites are mostly those of accrediting bodies

that are expressly referenced in Acupuncture Board and Chiropractic Board rules.

Thus, the Court may take judicial notice of these websites.

2

See Glenn Hegar, in his Official capacity as Texas Comptroller, and Ken Paxton, in his Official

Capacity as Texas Attorney General v. Texas Small Tobacco Coalition, Petitioner’s Brief on the

Merits, at 8, 10, 12, 18-19, 24-25, 59, available at:

http://www.search.txcourts.gov/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaVersionID=bc596889-bf61-4627-

9d27-aabddbfb9bb9&coa=cossup&DT=BRIEFS&MediaID=19589422-da99-407a-81c1-

61f33732e971.

3

PRAYER

Appellant Texas Association of Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine

respectfully prays that this Court deny the Chiropractic Board’s motion to strike.

The Acupuncture Association further requests any other relief to which it may be

entitled.

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Craig T. Enoch

Craig T. Enoch

Texas Bar No. 00000026

cenoch@enochkever.com

Melissa A. Lorber

Texas Bar No. 24032969

mlorber@enochkever.com

Shelby O'Brien

Texas Bar No. 24037203

sobrien@enochkever.com

ENOCH KEVER PLLC

600 Congress Avenue

Suite 2800

Austin, Texas 78701

512.615.1200 Telephone

512.615.1198 Fax

Attorneys for Texas Association of

Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine

4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, on October 29, 2015, the Acupuncture Association’s

Response to the Chiropractic Board’s Motion to Strike was served via electronic

service on the following:

Joe H. Thrash

Assistant Attorney General

Administrative Law Division

P.O. Box 12548

Austin, Texas 78711

Joe.Thrash@texasattorneygeneral.gov

/s/ Craig T. Enoch

Craig T. Enoch

5

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.