The opinion
ACCEPTED
03-15-00252-CV
7360581
THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
AUSTIN, TEXAS
10/13/2015 5:12:48 PM
JEFFREY D. KYLE
CLERK
RECEIVED IN
3rd COURT OF APPEALS
CONSTANCE H. PFEIFFER AUSTIN, TEXAS
BOARD CERTIFIED ♦ CIVIL APPELLATE LAW D IRECT (713)
10/13/2015 951-6227
5:12:48 PM
TEXAS BOARD OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION cpfeiffer@beckredden.com
JEFFREY D. KYLE
Clerk
October 13, 2015
Re: No. 03-15-00252-CV, Dr. Behzad Nazari, D.D.S., et al. v. The State of
Texas v. Xerox Corporation, et al., In the Third Court of Appeals of Texas
Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk of the Court By E-Filing
Third Court of Appeals
Price Daniel Sr. Building
209 West 14th Street, Room 101
Austin, Texas 78701
Dear Mr. Kyle:
The State of Texas filed an Unopposed Motion to Postpone Argument in the
above-referenced matter. In the motion, the State explained its schedule conflict
with the November 4th setting and proposed alternatives dates on which the parties
have no conflicting court appearances.
Xerox wishes to clarify that the week of November 16th is available—
except for November 18th, because Xerox’s lead trial counsel has a previously
scheduled oral argument on that day. Xerox could be available to present
argument on any other day that week or November 23-25th (before Thanksgiving).
Very truly yours,
/s/ Connie Pfeiffer
Connie Pfeiffer