Opinion

Office of Administration v. State Employees' Retirement Board

  • 163 A.3d 395
  • 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1698
  • 2016 WL 7011702
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Aug 3, 2016
Status
Published
On the bench
Per Curiam
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 53.6%

The opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT M.D. Appeal Dkt.

77 MAP 2016

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION AND : No. 76 MAL 2016

PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, :

:

Petitioners : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

: the Order of the Commonwealth Court

:

v. :

:

:

STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT :

BOARD, :

:

Respondent :

:

BRUCE A. EDWARDS, JOSESPH R. :

KOVEL, JOSEPH E. SARKIS, PA STATE :

TROOPERS ASSOCIATION, :

:

Intervenors :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED. The issue, as framed by Petitioners, is as follows:

Did [the] Commonwealth Court erroneously affirm the decision of the State

Employees’ Retirement Board that union stipends, paid to union officers to work

exclusively for the union, are retirement-covered compensation, when that

decision was clearly contrary to the mandates of the State Employees’

Retirement Code and inconsistent with decisions of this Honorable Court?

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.