Opinion

Martha Barron v. Fernando Barron

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
Aug 2, 2016
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Opinion issued August 2, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-16-00175-CV

———————————

MARTHA BARRON, Appellant

V.

FERNANDO BARRON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 312th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2012-27372

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Martha Barron has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for

purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE

ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West Supp. 2015); Fees Charged in

the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial

Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015).

After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not

adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c)

(allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Brown, and Huddle.

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.