Opinion

in Re Evatrus D. Moss

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
Aug 2, 2016
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 2.7%

The opinion

Opinion issued August 2, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-16-00538-CV

———————————

IN RE EVATRUS D. MOSS, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Evatrus D. Moss seeks a writ of mandamus to require the Clerk of this Court

to file a new notice of appeal in appellate cause number 01–95–00571–CV.1 We

dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction.

1

The underlying case is The State of Texas v. Evatrus Derjuan Moss, cause number

88343, in the 80th District Court of Harris County, Texas. The case is no longer

pending.

Once our plenary power expires, we no longer have jurisdiction to vacate or

modify our judgment. See TEX. R. APP. P. 19.3. Because Moss filed no motion for

rehearing in cause number 01–95–00571–CV, and no petition for review was filed

with the Texas Supreme Court, this Court’s jurisdiction over this cause expired 60

days after our judgment issued on November 16, 1995. See Saudi v. Brieven, 176

S.W.3d 108, 117 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. denied); TEX. R. APP.

P. 19.1. Accordingly, we have no jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief. See TEX.

GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221 (West 2004) (appellate courts have jurisdiction to grant

writs of mandamus against district or county court judges or to enforce our

jurisdiction).

We dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Brown, and Huddle.

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.