Opinion

Washington Recorder Publishing Co. v. Ernst

  • 199 Wash. 176
  • 91 P.2d 718
  • 124 A.L.R. 667
  • 1939 Wash. LEXIS 585
Court
Washington Supreme Court
Filed
May 24, 1939
Status
Published
Author
Blake
On the bench
Millard, Blake
Cited by
47 cases
Authority
More cited than 2.3%

dealing with news distributors

How later courts described this case

  • dealing with news distributors
  • in effect overruled in Sound Cities Gas & Oil Co. v. Ryan, 13 Wash. 2d 457, 125 P.2d 246 (1942)

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Blake, C. J.

(dissenting) — I dissent. Measured even by the common law concepts of

independent contractor

and

master and servant,

paper carriers, under' such contracts as that with which we are here concerned, fall within the latter class.

Wilson v. Times Printing Co.,

158 Wash. 95 , 290 Pac. 691 . But the relationship between the plaintiff and its carriers is to be measured by the statutory definition of “employment,” and not by those common law concepts. That the statutory definition of employment is not an embodiment of those concepts, has already been recognized by this court.

McDermott v. State.,

196 Wash. 261 , 82 P. (2d) 568 . In § 19 (g) (1) and (2), chapter 162, Laws of 1937, the legislature has defined “employment” in terms broad enough to. include the common law concepts of both

independent contractor

and

master and servant.

In so defining the term, its obvious intent was to prevent the evasions which could arise from the refined distinctions which so often attend those common law concepts.

In a recent decision dealing with an identical definition of “employment,” the supreme court of North Carolina said:

“The power of the General Assembly to broaden or restrict common law concepts is widely recognized

(New York Central Railroad Co. v. White,

243 U. S. 188 , 37 S. Ct. 247 , 61 L. Ed. 667 , L. R. A. 1917D, 1, Ann. Cas. 1917D, 629;

McDermott v. State of Washington,

82 P. (2d) 568 ) and is not here challenged. Although

*198

the extent of the area encompassed by some of the definitions may cause surprise, the duty of this court is to expound and to interpret the law as it is given to us, not to re-draft it along lines which may seem to us more conservative and more desirable. The economic and social evil of unemployment in its broad sweep frequently disregards man-made geographic and political boundaries; perhaps, it follows that former boundaries must be surrendered in seeking a remedy for such an evil. If new social evils produce, as counter-forces, new ideas of control of these evils, and such ideas are brought to us from the legislative forum, we must guard against falling victims to that suspicion which is born of the mere novelty of things.”

Unemployment Compensation Commission v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co., 2

S. E. (2d) (N. C.) 584.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.