Opinion

State Ex Rel. Raines v. City of Seattle

  • 134 Wash. 360
  • 235 P. 968
  • 1925 Wash. LEXIS 695
Court
Washington Supreme Court
Filed
May 8, 1925
Status
Published
Author
MacKintosh
On the bench
Holcomb, MacKintosh
Cited by
27 cases

The opinion

Mackintosh, J.

(dissenting) — While I agree with what is said in sustaining the charter provision relating to preference to veterans, I cannot agree with the interpretation of that provision to the effect that all persons passing a competitive examination, no matter what their standing in such examination, are “equally qualified.” It seems to me that qualification is to be determined by the relative standing upon such examination, and if that is true, then some of the appellants, having obtained a higher percentage in

*378

the tests, are more qualified for the positions than are those of the preferred class whose standing is lower. I conclude, therefore, that as to certain of the appellants they are entitled to the relief they seek, and I therefore dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.