Opinion

Shively v. Garage Employees Local Union No. 44

  • 6 Wash. 2d 560
  • 108 P.2d 354
Court
Washington Supreme Court
Filed
Dec 12, 1940
Status
Published
On the bench
Beals, Blake, Driver, Jeffers, Millard
Cited by
23 cases

"we are concerned with balancing appellants' right to carry on lawful businesses, free from unreasonable interference, and respondents' right to freedom of speech"

How later courts described this case

  • "we are concerned with balancing appellants' right to carry on lawful businesses, free from unreasonable interference, and respondents' right to freedom of speech"

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

While in my opinion the restraint of picketing at the place of business of an employer with whom a labor organization or any other group has some disagreement violates no right of free speech or free assembly, under the Federal constitution, in so far as the situation here presented is concerned, I feel bound by some recent decisions of the supreme court of the United States, whose duty it is, under the constitution, to interpret that document; and I accordingly dissent from the conclusion reached by the majority.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.