Opinion

McPherson v. McPherson

  • 200 Wash. 365
  • 93 P.2d 428
Court
Washington Supreme Court
Filed
Aug 30, 1939
Status
Published
Author
Blake
On the bench
Jeffers, Blake
Cited by
17 cases
Authority
More cited than 2.3%

reading Masterson as holding that an interlocutory order is final and conclusive insofar as it affects the division of property

How later courts described this case

  • reading Masterson as holding that an interlocutory order is final and conclusive insofar as it affects the division of property

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Blake, C. J.

(dissenting) — The statute, Rem. Rev. Stat. (Sup.), § 988 [P. C. § 7507] (Laws of 1933, p. 432, § 1), makes the interlocutory order “final and conclusive upon the parties” in so far as it affects “the custody, management and division of property.” An interlocutory order is, in this respect, a final decree and was so held to be in

Masterson v. Ogden,

78 Wash. 644 , 139 Pac. 654 , Ann. Cas. 1914D, 885.

I dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.