Opinion

Christie v. the Port of Olympia

  • 27 Wash. 2d 534
  • 179 P.2d 294
  • 1947 Wash. LEXIS 304
Court
Washington Supreme Court
Filed
Apr 8, 1947
Status
Published
Author
Simpson
On the bench
Robinson, Millard, Simpson, Mallery, Steinert, Jeffers, Schwellenbach, Abel, Hill
Cited by
21 cases

although the statute was silent, the port district had implied power to hire employees

How later courts described this case

  • although the statute was silent, the port district had implied power to hire employees
  • the state’s power to employ includes the doctrine of implied powers

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Simpson, J.

(dissenting)—I am of the opinion that port officials have no authority to issue warrants for

“retroactive

additional compensation,

retroactive

over-time compensation, or

retroactive

vacation pay.” My reason is that Art. II, § 25, of the constitution of the state of Washington, which reads:

“Extra Compensation, Prohibited.—The legislature shall never grant any extra compensation to any public officer, agent, servant, or contractor after the services shall have been rendered or the contract entered into, nor shall the compensation of any public officer be increased or diminished during his term of office,”

means exactly what it says. The provisions of the constitution are clear and definite, and cannot be changed by the contracts of agents, by the acts of the legislature, or by judicial interpretation.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.